Approve selection of DELTAWRX for the 911 Consolidation Feasibility Study BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
LEWIS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF: RESOLUTION NO. 20-243
SELECTION OF DELTAWRX FOR THE 911
CONSOLIDATION FEASIBILITY STUDY
WHEREAS, the Lewis County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) has identified a
need to conduct a feasibility analysis and assessment for the development of shared
911 services with another primary public safety answering point (PSAP) (Thurston
County); and
WHEREAS, qualified consulting services are needed; and
WHEREAS, Lewis County staff along with the City of Chehalis, the City of Centralia,
Riverside Fire Authority and TCOMM have reviewed submitted proposals and
determined that DELTAWRX is the best qualified consultant to provide 911 Consolidation
Feasibility Study Services; and
WHEREAS, a consultant agreement was negotiated with DELTAWRX for the 911
Consolidation Feasibility Study Services for Lewis County not to exceed $96,922 and to
be completed by December 31, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant Agreement is attached as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the County Manager has had the opportunity to review the agreement
reached with DELTAWRX in the amount of $96,922 and recommends approval; and
WHEREAS, a cost-sharing agreement has been reached with the City of Chehalis, the
City of Centralia, Riverside Fire Authority and Lewis County to be split evenly four ways;
and
WHEREAS, the MOU for cost sharing is attached as Exhibit B.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the consultant agreement for 911
Consolidation Feasibility Study Services for Lewis County shall be executed with
DELTAWRX in the amount of $96,922 and upon presentation of such a consultant
agreement, the County Manager is authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County
Commissioners; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the MOU for cost sharing shall be
executed with the City of Chehalis, the City of Centralia and Riverside Fire Authority and
upon presentation of such agreement, the County Manager is authorized to sign on
behalf of the Board of County Commissioners.
DONE IN OPEN SESSION this 13th day of July, 2020.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Jonathan Meyer, Prosecuting Attorney LEWIS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Amber Smith Gary Stamper
By: Amber Smith, Gary Stamper, Chair
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
ATTEST: ,y��°P ooF As,;;,, Edna J J . Fund
'L=:.Edna J. Fund, Vice Chair
Rieva Lester 4,c1
s'�cot "~ Robert C . Jackson
Rieva Lester, Robert C. Jackson, Commissioner
Clerk of the Lewis County Board of County
Commissioners
PERSONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN LEWIS COUNTY AND DELTAWRX LLC
PARTIES TO THE CONTRACT
This Contract is made and entered into by and between Lewis County hereinafter referred to collectively
as the"COUNTY"and DELTAWRX LLC,a California limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as the
"CONSULTANT." The COUNTY and the CONSULTANT together, are hereinafter referred to as the
"PARTIES"and their addresses are as follows:
Lewis County
351 NW North St
Chehalis WA 98532
DELTAWRX LLC
21700 Oxnard Street,Suite 830
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
PURPOSE
County hereby enters into a contract agreement with CONSULTANT to assess the feasibility of
consolidating dispatch operations in Lewis County and Thurston County,Washington.
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
Subject to other Contract provisions, the period of performance under this Contract will commence on
July 7,2020 and continue through December 31, 2020,unless terminated sooner or extended as provided
herein.
STATEMENT OF WORK
The CONSULTANT agrees to provide to the COUNTY services and any material at the costs that are set
forth in the project Statement of Work attached hereto and identified as Appendix A. The Statement of
Work is incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof as though set forth in full at this point.
STATUS OF THE PARTIES
CONSULTANT provides such services as an independent contractor using CONSULTANT'S own officers,
agents,employees,or contractors. This Contract shall not be construed to make COUNTY an employer or
joint employer of CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers,agents,employees, or contractors.
FUNDING/COMPENSATION
Total CONSULTANT compensation will not exceed $96,922 Dollars unless this Contract is subsequently
amended by both parties in writing. This amount is inclusive of all costs including, but not limited to
administrative,travel, report production and related expenses.
BILLING PROCEDURES AND PAYMENT
CONSULTANT shall be paid progress payments upon approval of CONSULTANT's invoices for services that
are delivered and accepted, provided that said invoices reflect the completion of project milestones by
the CONSULTANT (milestones are points at which significant components of the project have been
completed and at which project deliverables of material value have been received by the County). The
following milestones have been identified for this project,which upon completion, may be invoiced at the
amounts set forth in Figure 2 of Appendix A:
1. Hold Project Planning Meeting to Initiate the Project.
2. Conduct Project Kickoff Meeting with the Project Team and other Interested Stakeholders.
3. Gather Information for Analysis.
4. Benchmark Current Environment.
5. Assess Consolidation and Identify Service Delivery Improvement Alternatives.
6. Develop Staffing and Financial Models.
7. Conduct Dispatch Consolidation Workshop.
8. Develop Implementation Plan and Funding Options.
All invoices must describe and document in detail, to the COUNTY'S satisfaction, all of the work
performed. The CONSULTANT must provide a detailed breakdown of expenses, identifying what was
expended and when. Any fees for additional services will be discussed and approved by the COUNTY in
advance of services being performed.
The COUNTY may, in its sole discretion, terminate the Contract or withhold payments claimed by the
CONSULTANT for services rendered if the CONSULTANT fails to satisfactorily comply with any term or
condition of this Contract.
WITHHOLDING PAYMENT
In the event the CONSULTANT has failed to perform any substantial obligation required under this
Contract the COUNTY shall notify the CONSULTANT in writing. If that failure has not been cured within
thirty days after notification, then the COUNTY may, upon written notice, withhold all monies due and
payable to CONSULTANT,without penalty, until such failure to perform is cured or otherwise adjudicated.
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
The Contract Manager for each of the PARTIES shall be the contact person for all communications and
billings regarding the performance of this Contract.
The COUNTY representative shall be Erik Martin,351 NW North St,Chehalis WA 98532; 360-740-
2697, erik.martin@lewiscountvwa.gov.
The CONSULTANT representative shall be Brian Hudson, 21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 830,
Woodland Hills,CA 91367;818-227-9300, bhudson@deltawrx.com.
INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE
With respect to the performance of this Contract,CONSULTANT shall comply with Title 51 of the Revised
Code of Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries to its employees and agrees that COUNTY
shall have no obligations under that Title to any of CONSULTANT's officers, agents, employees, or
contractors.
INDEMNITY AND DEFENSE
To the fullest extent permitted by law,the CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify,defend and hold the County
and its departments, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers, harmless from
and against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to court costs,
attorney's fees and alternative dispute resolution costs,which 1)are caused in whole or in part by any act
or omission, negligent or otherwise, of the CONSULTANT, its employees, agents or volunteers; or 2) are
directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from,or in connection with performance of this Agreement.
This indemnification obligation of the CONSULTANT shall not apply in the limited circumstance where the
claim, damage, loss or expense is caused by the sole negligence of the County. The foregoing
indemnification obligations of the CONSULTANT are a material inducement to County to enter into this
Agreement,are reflected in the CONSULTANT's compensation,and have been mutually negotiated by the
parties.
INSURANCE
Without limiting CONSULTANT's indemnification of County, and prior to commencement of Work,
CONSULTANT shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement,
policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to County:
General Liability Insurance.CONSULTANT shall maintain general liability insurance with limits not less than
$1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 General Aggregate. The Commercial General Liability Coverage
shall include the following endorsements:
The County, its Board, officers, agents and employees shall be included as Additional Insureds either by
specific endorsement naming these parties or a blanket additional insured endorsement applicable"when
required by written contract or agreement"; and
Primary/Non-contributory endorsement in favor of the County,its Board,officers,agents and employees,
or in the alternative, a blanket waiver of subrogation endorsement applicable "when required by written
contract or agreement".
CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance to County as evidence of the insurance coverage
required herein. Insurance certificates and endorsement must be approved by County's Risk Manager
prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with
County at all times during the term of this contract. County reserves the right to require complete,
certified copies of all required insurance policies,at any time.
CHOICE OF LAW AND VENUE
This Agreement is made in Lewis County, Washington. It shall be construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Washington(excluding Washington's choice of law rules). Any action to enforce any rights
or obligations created by this Agreement or to construe this Agreement shall be brought in the Superior
Court of Washington for Thurston County in Olympia.
SURVIVAL OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and all of their
respective heirs,successors, and to their assigns. The terms, conditions, and warranties contained in this
Agreement that by their sense and context are intended to survive the completion of the performance,
cancellation,or termination of this Agreement shall so survive.
SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement is found to be contrary to law or is declared null and void by a court of
competent jurisdiction,the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect and binding upon the
parties.
WAIVER
Waiver of any default or breach shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default or breach.
Any waiver shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless stated to be
such in writing and signed by the parties hereto or by their authorized representatives.
INTERPRETATION
This Contract was negotiated and drafted jointly by the parties,and it shall not be construed against either
party in case of any dispute.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement:
(a) Contains the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter covered,
(b) Supersedes all prior and contemporaneous understandings,and
(c) May only be amended in a written instrument signed by the parties.
This CONTRACT is executed by the persons signing below who warrant that they have the authority to
execute the Contract.
LEWIS COUNTY DELTA •
IL•
By: ri Martin By: Brian Hudson
Title: Lewis County Manager Title:Authorized Agent
o 7/06/ea 0-4 . 6 - 3 d - zO
DATE DATE
Appendix A - Statement of Work
Lewis County("County") has contracted with DELTAWRX to provide the services identified in
Appendix A of the Lewis County-DELTAWRX Agreement("Agreement"). This Statement of
Work("SOW') herein guides the primary activities and responsibilities for the 911 Consolidation
Feasibility Study project. It identifies each major task that DELTAWRX will complete, a project
schedule and the associated fees for each project task.
Project Tasks
This project will analyze the feasibility of consolidating Lewis County 911 dispatching services with
TCOMM,a non-profit PSAP in neighboring Thurston County,as well as considering alternatives to
improve service delivery internally,should a regional approach be deemed suboptimal. The
following project tasks will explore how regionalization and other changes to the dispatching model
might impact call processing and call flow,staffing and operations, facilities and equipment and
capital expenditures and operational budgets. In addition,these project tasks will support
implementation planning for the desired path forward and provide recommendations for funding
options.
A successful effort will fulfill the County's goals of ensuring that public safety is a top priority,
making best use of taxpayer dollars,supporting efficiency and effectiveness in an employee-friendly
professional environment and facilitating a consensus-based decision-making model among the
diverse group of project stakeholders.
Task 1-Hold Project Planning Meeting—To initiate the project,DELTAWRX will facilitate a
meeting to finalize the work plan and project schedule,develop a project communications and
reporting plan and discuss any constraints and risks that could affect project outcomes.
Task 2-Conduct Project Kickoff Meeting—DELTAWRX will conduct a project kickoff
meeting with the Project Team and other interested stakeholders. We recommend inviting agency
leadership,command staff and leaders from the participating municipalities to ensure clarity
regarding project drivers,objectives,and team member roles and responsibilities. During the
meeting,we will review our work plan,deliverables and project timeline,discuss our approach to
collecting data and answer any questions from project stakeholders,as appropriate.
Task 3-Gather Information for Analysis—DELTAWRX will gather information from a variety
of sources to enable a complete and factual understanding of the current environment and the
factors contributing to the feasibility of dispatch consolidation. To accomplish this task,we will:
■ Review Background Data—DELTAWRX will review any documentation that provides
background information or context for the 911 Consolidation Feasibility Study,as well as
information regarding the state of existing facilities,operations and systems.
■ Survey Participating Agencies—DELTAWRX will distribute a Statistics Checklist and a
k.'
Staffing,Technology and Facilities Survey that lists the information we need to conduct
subsequent analysis. These documents include items such as technology and equipment,
incoming administrative and emergency call volumes by day of week and hour of day,call
for service levels,annual reports,budgets,maintenance agreements,salary and benefit
structures,agency size and staffing statistics.
■ Interview Personnel—DELTAWRX will work with the Project Team to identify a list of
stakeholders to interview. We expect that the list will indude representatives and subject
matter experts from Lewis and Thurston County and their respective law enforcement and
fire departments,as well as EMS providers and potential external stakeholders.
• Shadow Operations—To further understand the operations and culture of each of the two
Counties'communications centers,DELTAWRX will shadow telecommunicators to ensure
that we understand their business processes and environment.
Task 4-Benchmark Current Environment—To confirm our understanding of the status quo
and to provide a sound basis for subsequent analysis,DELTAWRX will document the existing
K?;
emergency communications environment in Lewis County and Thurston County. We expect to
document and analyze:
■ Facilities, focusing primarily on the ability for Lewis County 911 Communications or
TCOMM to support consolidated operations
• Technology,especially with regards to the CAD systems in use,systems interfaced to CAD,
GIS,two-way radio systems,the flow of voice and data information through the various
systems,and what equipment,networks,hardware and software can be used or modified for
use in a consolidated public safety communications environment
■ Operations, focusing on similarities and differences among the two PSAPs in:
— Call loads,call volumes,call for service volumes
— PSAP call routing,call handling methods,non-emergency call processing
• — Standard operating procedures,policies and service levels for both law enforcement and
fire/EMS dispatch operations
— Staffing,scheduling and cross-training
rY — Mutual aid agreements,interoperability facilitators
— Non-communications tasks performed by communications staff,such as WACIC/NCIC
entries,video monitoring,cash disbursement,etc.
— Current staffing levels,induding both authorized positions and filled positions
• Human resource practices,focusing on similarities and differences among the two PSAPs in
the following areas:
— Supervision and management structures
— Training and quality assurance practices
— Salary,vacation,seniority,retirement plans and benefit structures
— Recruitment efforts,and reasons for and rates of turnover
• Financial factors,focusing on current operating costs and planned capital expenditures
DELTAWRX will present our understanding of the environment to the Project Team for validation
• before proceeding with subsequent tasks.
p�-
Task 5-Assess Consolidation and Identify Service Delivery Improvement Alternatives—
DELTAWRX will assess the feasibility of consolidating and co-locating Lewis County and Thurston
County 911 dispatching services. For each scenario,we will create a conceptual plan that describes
the facility,space, technology and projected staffing requirements and provide an overview of
operations,accounting for both communications and non-communications tasks. We will describe
.F- the anticipated advantages and disadvantages of each option,which could pertain to service delivery,
call processing times,mutual aid/response times,training,costs and other factors. In addition,
should regionalization be deemed suboptimal,we will identify potential alternative actions that Lewis
County could pursue internally to improve dispatch service delivery.
is
Task 6-Develop Staffing and Financial Models—Concurrent with our assessment of
consolidation and identification of service delivery improvement alternatives,DELTAWRX will
prepare detailed staffing and financial models. Our staffing model will incorporate industry
standards,the projected call volumes and workloads by hour of day,service levels,scheduling,
staffing ratios,radio talk channels,radio channel discipline and radio traffic volume. We will use the
model to identify the optimal number and type of staff,including technical support and on-call
personnel,GIS personnel,communications officers and supervisors.
Personnel and technology costs are typically the two largest inputs into a consolidated public safety
dispatch center financial model. If a new facility or substantial expansions to the existing facilities
are required,additional financial considerations are clearly necessary. To determine the financial
impact of consolidation,DELTAWRX will project one-time capital expenditures (e.g.,facility
renovations or technology investments,such as software licenses or interface development costs),
transition costs (e.g.,training and professional service fees),and operating costs (e.g.,administrative,
technology maintenance and personnel). We will compare these costs to the current environment to
identify the delta. We plan to baseline our analysis against current authorized staffing levels at the
two emergency communications centers unless an alternative method is desired.
Task 7-Conduct Dispatch Consolidation Workshop—To ensure our efforts and final
recommendations result in both a practical implementation plan and meaningful change,we propose
conducting a half-day workshop for the project team and municipality leadership. In the first
portion of the workshop,DELTAWRX will present our assessment of the feasibility of dispatch
consolidation,including how consolidation and co-location with TCOMM address (or fail to
address) shortcomings in the current environment,as compared to the alternative internal service
delivery improvement mechanisms we identified. We will facilitate a discussion regarding the
feasibility of consolidation and our findings,and obtain feedback from the group regarding the
preferred path forward. While we do not anticipate reaching full consensus-based final decisions
during the workshop,we believe that the collective process of narrowing the path forward is a
critical step in building stakeholder buy-in. In addition,this process provides a transparent forum
for stakeholders to voice preferences,comments and concerns.
In the second portion of the workshop,should consolidation be appealing to the participants,we
will facilitate a structured discussion about the governance options that are available in a regional
dispatch model. In the event that consolidation is not viewed as a viable option,we will spend this
ti:
time obtaining feedback from the representatives from the Lewis County agencies on the internal
service delivery improvement alternatives,including priorities,resource requirements,concerns and
how these recommendations might dovetail with other organizational and/or Countywide efforts.
We are additionally able to conduct a hybrid approach to the second half of the workshop,should
this be desired.
Task 8-Develop Implementation Plan and Funding Options—Our final report will
summarize our findings,analysis and recommendations in the areas of staffing,technology,
equipment,facilities,human resources, finances and governance. Should consolidation be desired,
we will discuss the opportunities and challenges associated with transitioning to a consolidated
entity,including the operational effectiveness of consolidation,as well as the drivers and barriers to
implementation,provide governance recommendations based on the discussion held during the
workshop and prepare an implementation plan. Should the team determine that consolidation is not
a feasible option,we will prepare an implementation plan for the internal service delivery
improvement alternatives,incorporating feedback received during the workshop. In either case,we
will document funding options to support the desired path forward,in an effort to ensure the long-
term financial sustainability of the decision.
DELTAWRX will deliver the final report to the project team in draft format and will update the
document as necessary to incorporate any feedback that is received.
Project Schedule
The preliminary project schedule shown in Figure 1 assumes a start date of July 7,2020. Given the
fluid nature of project planning and the current public health environment as a result of COVID-19,
this schedule may be adjusted as necessary.
DELTAWRX has factored time into the schedule to accommodate known holidays and natural
project lag times (e.g.,review cycles),but we have not built time into the schedule to accommodate
delays on the part of project team resources. We will plan to review this proposed project schedule
with the County's Project Manager and other key stakeholders as an initial project task.
Figure 1 —Preliminary Project Schedule
Task Estimated Estimated
Start Date Finish Date
1 Hold Project Planning Meeting 7/7/2020 7/7/2020
2 Conduct Project Kickoff Meeting 7/21/2020 7/21/2020
3 Gather Information for Analysis 7/7/2020 7/31/2020
4 Benchmark Current Environment 8/3/2020 8/21/2020
Assess Consolidation and Identify Service Delivery
5 Improvement Alternatives 8/31/2020 9/18/2020
6 Develop Staffing and Financial Models 8/31/2020 9/18/2020
Estimated Estimated
Start Date Finish Date
II Conduct Dispatch Consolidation Workshop 10/12/2020 10/13/2020
8 Develop Implementation Plan and Funding Options 11/2/2020 12/4/2020
Project Fees
Figure 2 identifies the firm-fixed fee to perform the above-described tasks. This fee is inclusive of
all administrative,travel,report production and related expenses. DELTAWRX will invoice the
County upon the completion of each task.
Figure 2 - Project Fees
Task Hours Fees
1 Hold Project Planning Meeting 4 $ 989
2 Conduct Project Kickoff Meeting 12 $ 2,967
3 Gather Information for Analysis 80 $ 19,780
4 Benchmark Current Environment 88 $ 21,758
5 Assess Consolidation and Identify Service Deliver
Improvement Alternatives 48 $ 11,868
6 Develop Staffing and Financial Models 48 $ 11,868
7 Conduct Dispatch Consolidation Workshop 36 $ 8,901
8 Develop Implementation Plan and Funding Options
76 $ 18,791
Total I 922
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
COST SHARING AGREEMENT
Introduction
This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into between the County of Lewis
("County"), the City of Centralia ("Centralia"), the City of Chehalis ("Chehalis"), and the
Riverside Fire Authority ("Riverside FA"), collectively (the "Parties"). The Parties agree to
jointly fund a 911 Consolidation Feasibility Study ("Study"), which study shall be conducted
under the direction of Erik Martin, Lewis County Manager. The scope of work will include
the following areas, among others, as referenced in the attached Statement of Work—
Exhibit A:
1. Call Processing and Call Flow
2. Staffing and Operations
3. Facility and Equipment
4. Capital and Operational Budgets
5. Implementation Planning
6. Funding Options
The County, Centralia, Chehalis, and the Riverside FA hereby agree to share in the cost of the
feasibility study as set forth herein below. The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding
is to set forth the Parties' agreement with respect to contributions that shall be paid by the
County, Centralia, Chehalis and the Riverside FA.
Amount of Cost Sharing
All of the Parties hereby agree to provide payment to fund the Study in the following amounts:
Agency Amount
County of Lewis $24,230.50
City of Centralia $24,230.50
City of Chehalis $24,230.50
Riverside Fire Authority $24,230.50
Total $96,922.00
Terms
1. Maximum Proposed Study Cost: In the event of any cost over-runs that later cause the
final total cost of the Study to exceed the initial proposed amount, then the final total cost
shall be allocated among the Parties in accordance with future negotiation and mutual
agreement.
Memorandum of Understanding
Cost Sharing Agreement re 911 Consolidation Feasibility Study
Page 2
2. Payment: County will, as an advance, make the progress payments to the consultant in
the full amount of the cost of the study as it progresses on a monthly basis. Chehalis,
Centralia and Riverside FA hereby agree to make payment to County to reimburse County for
their portion of the cost as set forth above, within 30 days of receipt of notice that the
County has made the payment to the consultant. This same procedure regarding payment
by the County and reimbursement to the County from the other Parties shall also apply in
the event of any cost over-runs that later cause the final total cost of the Study to exceed the
initial proposed amount.
3.Termination: This Agreement will automatically terminate if the subject proposal is not
funded. If funded,this Agreement will remain in effect until the Study has been completed
and all cost sharing commitments have been met.
4. Notices: Any notice required or permitted to be given under this agreement shall be in
writing and may be given by personal delivery or by U.S. Postal Service mail. Notice shall be
deemed given upon actual receipt in the case of personal delivery or within three (3)
business days after mailing. The address for service of notices for each party is set forth
adjacent to the signatures below.
5. No Waiver: The wavier or failure of any party to exercise, in any respect, any right
provided in this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any other right or remedy to
which the party may be entitled.
6. Integrated Agreement: The terms and conditions set forth herein constitute the entire
agreement between the Parties as to the matters set forth herein and supersede any
communications or previous agreements with respect to the subject matter of this
Agreement.There are no written or oral understandings directly or indirectly related to this
Agreement that are not set forth herein. No change can be made to this Agreement other
than in a writing signed by the Parties.
7. Governing Law and Venue:The Parties agree that any action to interpret or enforce this
Agreement shall be governed and enforced according to the laws of the State of Washington
and any dispute under this Agreement shall be brought in the Superior Court in and for the
County of Lewis.
8. Attorney Fees: If any party(ies) hereto brings any legal action regarding the interpretation
or enforcement of this Agreement,the prevailing party(ies) shall be entitled to recover its
reasonable attorney fees from the non-prevailing party(ies) in the litigation, in addition to
any other relief that may be granted.
9. Severability: If any term or provision of this Agreement is held by a court to be invalid or
unenforceable,then this Agreement, including all of the remaining terms, will remain in full
force and effect as if such invalid or unenforceable term or provision had never been
included.
10. Contra Proferentem Rule Excluded:This Agreement was negotiated jointly by the
n ..L...II ........J:......a..
Memorandum of Understanding
Cost Sharing Agreement re 911 Consolidation Feasibility Study
Page 3
[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES]
Memorandum of Understanding
Cost Sharing Agreement re 911 Consolidation Feasibility Study
Page 4
Concurrence
The County of Lewis agrees to make the payments identified above, and will comply with
the terms of this MOU.
County of Lewis
By: Eri Martin
Title: County Manager
Date: ea4/AO7--0
County of Lewis
Erik Martin, County Manager
351 NW North Street
Chehalis, WA, 98532
Telephone: (360)740-2697
Erik.Martin@lewiscountywa.gov
The City of Centralia agrees to make the payments identified above, and will comply with
the terms of this MOU.
City of Centralia
y: Rob Hill
Title: Centralia City Manager
Date:
City of Centralia
Rob Hill, City Manager
118 Maple St
PO Box 609
Centralia, WA 98531
Telephone: (360)330-7674
Rhill@cityofcentralia.com
Memorandum of Understanding
Cost Sharing Agreement re 911 Consolidation Feasibility Study
Page 5
The City of Chehalis agrees to make the payments identified above, and will comply with
the terms of this MOU.
City of Chehalis
By:Jill Anderson
Title:Chehalis City Manager
Date:
City of Chehalis
Jill Anderson, City Manager
350 N Market Blvd, Room 101
Chehalis, WA 98532
Telephone: (360)345-1042
jnderson@ci.chehalis.wa.us
Riverside Fire Authority agrees to make the payments identified above, and will comply
with the terms of this MOU.
Riverside Fire Authority
By: Mike Kytt�
Title: Fire Chief
Date: 06
Riverside Fire Authority
Mike Kytta, Fire Chief
1818 Harrison Ave
Centralia, WA 98531
Telephone: (360)736-3975
mkytta@riversidefire.net
Memorandum of Understanding
Cost Sharing Agreement re 911 Consolidation Feasibility Study
Page 5
The City of Chehalis agrees to make the payments identified above, and will comply with
the terms of this MOU.
• City of Chehalis
By:Ji An er on
Title: Chehalis City Manager
Date: 1602 c>
City of Chehalis
Jill Anderson, City Manager
350 N Market Blvd, Room 101
Chehalis, WA 98532
Telephone: (360)345-1042
janderson@ci.chehalis.wa.us
Riverside Fire Authority agrees to make the payments identified above,and will comply
with the terms of this MOU.
Riverside Fire Authority
By: Mike Kytta
Title: Fire Chief
Date:
Riverside Fire Authority
Mike Kytta, Fire Chief
1818 Harrison Ave
Centralia, WA 98531
Telephone: (360)736-3975
mkytta@riversidefire.net
BOCC AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Resolution: BOCC Meeting Date: July 13, 2020
Suggested Wording for Agenda Item: Agenda Type: Deliberation
Selection of DELTAWRX for the 911 Consolidation Feasibility Study
Contact: Erik Martin Phone: 3607402697
Department: CM - County Manager (including Budget)
Description:
Consultant agreement for the 911 Consolidation Feasibility Study. County staff, city and fire
officials have reviewed the submitted proposals and determined that DELTAWRX is the best
qualified consultant to provide the services.
Approvals: Publication Requirements:
Publications:
User Status
PA's Office Approved
Additional Copies: Cover Letter To:
Scott Smitherman