2021.04.05_YMCA_Mineral_Lake_Critical_Areas_Letter_00LcghcEnvironmental Permitting and Sensitive
Areas Review
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence
Phase
Lewis County, Washington
for
YMCA
March 8, 2021
Environmental Permitting and Sensitive
Areas Review
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence
Phase
Lewis County, Washington
for
YMCA
March 8, 2021
2101 4th Avenue, Suite 950
Seattle, Washington 98121
206.728-2674
Environmental Permitting and Sensitive Areas
Review
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence
Phase
Lewis County, Washington
File No. 6565-008-00, Task 300
March 8, 2021
Prepared for:
YMCA
14230 NE Bel Red Road
Bellevue, Washington 98007
Attention: Josh Sutton and Meredith Cambre
Prepared by:
GeoEngineers, Inc.
2101 4th Avenue, Suite 950
Seattle, Washington 98121
206.728-2674
Emily R. Hurn
Environmental Scientist
Joseph O. Callaghan, MS, PWS
Principal Fisheries Biologist
David B. Conlin, MA, PWS
Senior Biologist
ERH:DBC:JOC:tlm
Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record.
March 8, 2021 | Page i File No. 6565-008-00
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... ES-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ............................................................................................................................. 1
3.0 DATA REVIEW .................................................................................................................................................... 2
3.1. Aquatic Areas Data ..................................................................................................................................... 2
3.2. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Data ................................................................................................................... 3
3.3. Soil Data ...................................................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE FINDINGS ................................................................................................................. 4
4.1. Methods and Limitations ............................................................................................................................ 4
4.2. Wetlands and Streams ............................................................................................................................... 5
4.2.1. Western Region ............................................................................................................................... 5
4.2.2. Central Region ................................................................................................................................. 5
4.2.3. Eastern Region ................................................................................................................................ 5
4.3. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas ........................................................................................... 6
4.4. Design Implications .................................................................................................................................... 6
4.4.1. Wetland Buffers ............................................................................................................................... 6
4.4.2. Stream Buffers ................................................................................................................................ 7
4.4.3. Shoreline Buffers ............................................................................................................................. 7
5.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................ 8
5.1. Federal Approval ...................................................................................................................................... 14
5.1.1. Clean Water Act ............................................................................................................................ 14
5.1.2. Section 7 ESA Compliance ........................................................................................................... 14
5.2. State Agencies/Approvals ....................................................................................................................... 14
5.2.1. Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) .................................................................. 14
5.2.2. Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) ..................................................... 14
5.2.3. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) ............................................................... 15
5.3. Lewis County Approvals ........................................................................................................................... 15
5.4. Permitting Schedule ................................................................................................................................ 15
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 16
7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................... 16
TABLES
Table 1. WDFW PHS Priority Habitats Mapped at Site
Table 2. Summary of Approximated Wetland Buffers
Table 3. Summary of Approximated Stream Buffers
Table 4. Potential Shoreline Buffers for Proposed Development Features
Table 5. Anticipated Permit Requirements
FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Wetland and Stream Reconnaissance
March 8, 2021 | Page ii File No. 6565-008-00
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Mapped Data Reports
Appendix B. Site Photographs
Appendix C. YMCA Mineral Lake Vicinity Map
Appendix D. YMCA Mineral Lake Conceptual Development Areas
March 8, 2021 | Page ES-1 File No. 6565-008-00
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
GeoEngineers completed an Environmental Permitting and Sensitive Areas Review in support of the YMCA
Mineral Lake Property Due Diligence Assessment. Our work included background research and data review,
a site reconnaissance to map approximate locations of potentially regulated environmental features, and
a permitting assessment for the potential use of the property as a YMCA camp.
Our site reconnaissance identified regulated sensitive areas within the proposed development areas which
include Mineral Lake and associated lake-fringe wetlands, streams and wetland features. Buffers
associated with these features were estimated based on our understanding of the applicable regulatory
code and approximated graphically on a site plan. This information was provided to Mithun, Inc. and the
YMCA for conceptual-level planning to develop a proposed layout for the camp. Our findings are considered
preliminary: regulatory buffers are subject to change based on a detailed site investigation and formal
wetland delineation and rating results; there is also potential for additional features within proposed
development areas that were not identified during the reconnaissance survey. Despite these data gaps,
there appears to be sufficient space on the property to establish a camp layout that meets the needs of
the YMCA. If proposed development features impact sensitive area features such as fill within streams,
wetlands and associated buffers, Lewis County Code allows for buffer width averaging and mitigation to
offset unavoidable impacts. We do not anticipate extensive permit coordination necessary for the currently
proposed design at the state and federal levels. Based on our evaluation of environmentally sensitive areas
and permitting requirements and current project understanding, we do not foresee an environmental
permitting reason the YMCA would not be able to develop the property as currently proposed. If the property
is acquired, we suggest the next step to be additional design and layout of site features, formally delineate
sensitive areas in the vicinity of site development and initiate agency coordination for permitting, especially
at the local level with Lewis County.
March 8, 2021 | Page 1 File No. 6565-008-00
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This memorandum presents a summary of findings associated with Task 300 – Environmental Permitting
and Sensitive Areas Review that GeoEngineers has completed in support of the YMCA Mineral Lake Property
Due Diligence Assessment (Project). This includes results of background research and data review, a site
reconnaissance to map approximate locations of potentially regulated environmental features, and a
permitting assessment for the potential use of the property as a YMCA camp.
The intent of this memorandum is to provide information to the YMCA for use evaluating the feasibility of
developing the subject property for the intended uses. Our primary goal is to address environmental
permitting considerations for site development, which will help the team identify site constraints, avoid and
minimize impacts to sensitive areas and evaluate suitability of the property to achieve the overall project
vision.
The project area is located in north Lewis County just south of the boundary with Thurston County and to
the east of Interstate-7, shown on Figure 1, Vicinity Map. The project area is located on the north end of
Mineral Lake. The town of Mineral is located next to the lake along the southern shores. The project site
exceeds 2,000 acres, located along the entire northern shoreline of the lake and extending north to a ridge
(“Mineral Hill”). The eastern site boundary is adjacent to Mineral Creek and the western site boundary
follows Mineral Hill Road. Due to the size of the project site, we separated the project area into three
regions: western, central and eastern (Figure 2, Wetland and Stream Reconnaissance).
2.0 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Our understanding of this project is based on our communications with the YMCA, Hartland LLC and other
members of the design team, as well as our previous and ongoing attendance at design team meetings.
We reviewed the provided request for proposal (RFP) document, “YMCA Seattle Mineral Lake Site Due
Diligence and Permitting Technical Services” obtained in an electronic mail dated October 30, 2019. We
were also provided by the YMCA the “Mineral Lake Program, version 2” project summary, other background
documents and prior application submittals for review while preparing this report.
We understand the overall project goal is to develop and operate a year-round youth and family camp on
the property. Project development is still in the conceptual phase and preliminary design drawings have not
yet been developed. As of the time of this report, the size of the proposed camp has not been determined;
the camp could range in size from an approximate 500-acre portion of the property to the entire
2,118 acres. Property development is anticipated to occur in phases over a period up to 20 years. It is
anticipated that the maximum area for improved portions of the camp will not exceed a total of about
100 acres; the remaining undeveloped portion of the property will be used for hiking and recreation and
will either remain in forestry production or be placed into conservation easements. Currently envisioned
site improvements may potentially include:
■ Expansion of the existing access road from Mineral Hill Road for passenger vehicles, delivery trucks
and emergency vehicles. A parking lot (or multiple lots) will also be developed to accommodate vehicle
traffic.
■ Development of a water supply system for the camp, including a water storage tank
March 8, 2021 | Page 2 File No. 6565-008-00
■ Wastewater conveyances and septic drainfields.
■ Stormwater facilities to collect, treat, infiltrate and/or discharge stormwater.
■ New building construction for a camp lodge, program shelters/classrooms, cabins, staff housing and
utility/maintenance. Individual buildings are anticipated to be up to about 9,000 square feet and be
supported by slab-on-grade and shallow foundation construction. Recreational camp features proposed
include ball fields, waterfront facilities including docks, campfire area, eco classroom, climbing tower,
and arts and crafts building.
3.0 DATA REVIEW
As a first step in our review, GeoEngineers researched existing information and maps identifying the
occurrence, locations and/or extents of potentially regulated natural resources—such as wetlands, streams,
other waterbodies and/or other sensitive fish and wildlife habitat types—within the project area vicinity. Our
search for pertinent and applicable data and maps consisted of a review of the following information
sources.
■ Public Databases:
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitat and Species (PHS)
database (WDFW 2020a);
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps
(USFWS 2020a);
USFWS IPaC Resource - List of Threatened and Endangered Species (USFWS 2020b);
United States Department of Agriculture – National Resource Conservation Service (USDA-
NRCS) Web Soil Survey (USDA-NRCS 2020);
Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Forest Practices Application
Review System (FPARS) (WDNR 2020);
WDFW SalmonScape Application (WDFW 2020b); and
Lewis County Mapped Data
■ Prior Studies:
Wetland, Stream and Lakeshore Delineation Sketch (The Watershed Company 2010)
Mapped data reports available from WDFW, USFWS, Lewis County and USDA-NRCS are included in
Appendix A, Mapped Data Reports.
3.1. Aquatic Areas Data
Aquatic areas at the site include Mineral Lake, wetlands and streams. Mineral Lake is 277 acres and
considered a “Shoreline of the State” and protected under the Shoreline Management Act regulations
(Chapter 90.58 RCW). The USFWS NWI online mapper (USFWS 2020a) depicts one mapped wetland within
the project area (Appendix A).
The WDNR FPARS map (WDNR 2020) identifies several streams throughout the project area. The largest
stream is Mineral Creek, located within the eastern boundary of the project area. According to WDNR
FPARS, Mineral Creek is a designated “Shoreline of the State” and is considered a Type S stream
March 8, 2021 | Page 3 File No. 6565-008-00
(WDNR 2020). SalmonScape identifies documented fish use within Mineral Creek by resident coastal
cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (WDFW 2020a,
WDFW 2020b). No anadromous fish species were identified within Mineral Creek or Mineral Lake due to
the presence of multiple total fish passage obstruction namely the Alder Dam downstream within the
Nisqually River.
There are two unnamed streams that flow into Mineral Lake at the north and northwestern ends of the lake
that are mapped as fish-bearing (Type F). There are several additional unnamed streams that are mapped
as “unknown” flowing into the northeastern section of the lake (WDNR 2020). WDNR FPARS map identifying
the streams within the project area is provided in Appendix A.
3.2. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Data
We also evaluated mapped data regarding fish and wildlife habitat, which are regulated under Lewis County
Code (LCC) 17.38.400 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCA). WDFW PHS maps the
following priority habitats at the site (see Appendix A for details):
TABLE 1. WDFW PHS PRIORITY HABITATS MAPPED AT SITE
Common Name Scientific Name WDFW PHS Priority Area
Little brown bat Myotis lucifugus • Breeding Area
Northern spotted owl Strix occidentalis • Nesting Habitat
• Breeding Area
• Management Buffer
Rocky Mountain elk Cervus elaphus nelsoni • Regular Concentration
Mule and black-tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus • Regular Concentration
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland* -- • Aquatic Habitat
Notes:
*This WDFW PHS wetland feature is also mapped by USFWS NWI Mapper
Within Mineral Lake, WDFW PHS maps the following priority habitats:
■ Freshwater emergent wetland (located along the northeast shoreline of the lake);
■ Resident coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki); and
■ Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
The USFWS maps the following species regulated under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) as potentially
being affected by activities at the site:
■ Gray wolf (Canis lupus);
■ North American wolverine (Gulo gulo luscus);
■ Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus);
■ Northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina);
■ Yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus); and
March 8, 2021 | Page 4 File No. 6565-008-00
■ Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus)
Of these mapped species, the Northern spotted owl (NSO) and marbled murrelet are the two that may
require impact evaluation as they are both classified as Threatened species under the ESA and there is
potential for suitable habitat at this site, unlike the other terrestrial species. There is no designated critical
habitat (DCH) for either species mapped at the site, but there is DCH for NSO approximately 4 miles to the
west (Appendix A).
3.3. Soil Data
The USDA-NRCS Web Soil Survey indicates 28 soil types within the project area (USDA-NRCS 2020). Five of
these soils are identified on the hydric soils list. See Appendix A for mapped soil types within the project
area.
4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE FINDINGS
As a second step in our review, GeoEngineers completed a site reconnaissance of the property to identify
the approximate locations and extents of potentially regulated sensitive areas and/or habitat types. Two
GeoEngineers biologists completed this reconnaissance on March 18, 2020. Photographs from the site
visit are provided in Appendix B, Site Photographs.
4.1. Methods and Limitations
Due to the size of the property and limitations on amount of time and effort allocated to this review, the
site visit was generally considered to be “reconnaissance-level”; in other words, we were not able to
examine the entire property in detail nor complete detailed boundary determinations for potentially
regulated features. The reconnaissance was limited to identifying regulated features within parcels
contained within “zones” A and C as depicted on the parcel map provided in Appendix C, YMCA Mineral
Lake Vicinity Map and was focused more specifically on the “proposed development zones” shown on the
map in Appendix D, YMCA Mineral Lake Conceptual Development Areas to provide planning level details.
Figure 2 provides a graphical map summary of the regulated aquatic features and associated buffers
identified during the reconnaissance, as well as a photo points for a subset of the site photographs
collected during this effort. Non-aquatic habitat conditions potentially regulated for sensitive terrestrial
wildlife (e.g., ESA-listed species) are described generally in the following sections according to the “regions”
identified on this map.
Considering the extensive size and challenging terrain, a large portion of the site was observed from the
road and by evaluating landscape patterns and topography as a means of identifying potential aquatic
features such as wetlands and streams. The ordinary high water mark (OHWM), which is a jurisdictional
boundary defining Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS), Waters of the State and Shorelines regulated under federal
and state laws, was not surveyed for streams or along the shoreline of Mineral Lake. Wetlands were
sketched and approximate extents and boundaries were identified based on indicators of hydrology and
vegetation. Subsurface soil conditions were not examined, wetland boundaries were estimated and not
formally delineated, and wetlands were not rated or classified based on Washington State guidance as part
of this effort. Stream reaches were assessed and estimated to be fish-bearing (Type F) or non-fish-bearing
(Type N) based on site characteristics and existing map resources (see Section 3.0 Data Review). Formal
March 8, 2021 | Page 5 File No. 6565-008-00
determinations of stream type were not completed as part of this effort due to the size of the site and time
limitations.
Due to the large size of the site and the dense forest, there may be additional wetlands and other small
drainages that were not documented. A complete shoreline OHWM delineation was not completed, and
additional lakeshore wetlands may exist in areas that were not directly observed. Therefore, the results
presented below and shown on Figure 2, are considered preliminary. Findings within the development
zones (Appendix D) have a higher level of detail and accuracy since the reconnaissance was focused within
these areas. Additional detailed investigations are anticipated to be needed prior to submittal of
development applications for specific improvements during development of the camp.
4.2. Wetlands and Streams
The preliminary wetland and stream findings are shown on Figure 2. Discussion of regulated features and
habitat conditions is separated by western, central and eastern regions of the site as shown.
4.2.1. Western Region
The entrance to the property is located off Mineral Hill Road at the western boundary of the property. The
western region of the site has been generally identified through conceptual design as the location for the
Family Camp, YMCA operating buildings and staff housing. As a result, this area was identified as a potential
development zone that was a significant focus of the survey. A large portion of this area has been recently
clear-cut. A mosaic of wetland features were identified within this portion of the site as well as several
streams both fish-bearing and non-fish-bearing. Previous wetland delineation flagging was observed within
this area and our field observations generally confirmed previously mapped features (TWC 2010).
4.2.2. Central Region
The central region of the site includes the large wetland feature that was mapped by several data sources
(WDFW 2020a, USFWS 2020a). Our observations confirmed the location of this wetland and also verified
a WDNR FPARS identified unnamed stream at the western outlet, which flows generally west to south
eventually connecting to Mineral Lake (WDNR 2020). Sections of this unnamed stream were directly
observed during the survey and identified as fish-bearing with some tributaries to it as non-fish-bearing.
Other stream sections were not directly observed but the stream location and surface flow was “assumed”
to continue and was mapped based on topography. Several tributaries to this stream were identified as
either fish-bearing or non-fish-bearing based on either field observations of size and gradient or gradient
based on topography. Figure 2 illustrates the fish-bearing and non-fish-bearing stream sections within this
drainage and identifies which reaches were field-verified versus assumed. Several other smaller wetland
features were also documented within this central region.
4.2.3. Eastern Region
Observations within the eastern region of the site extended roughly from the northeastern end of Mineral
Lake east to Mineral Creek. A focused field effort was performed in this area, which contains a larger
potential development zone currently envisioned as a future Youth Camp.
On the east side of the region, topography slopes gently downward toward Mineral Creek. This area is
characterized by an open meadow containing a large wetland. Two observed stream channels are
March 8, 2021 | Page 6 File No. 6565-008-00
associated with this wetland, one flowing in from the west (non-fish-bearing) and one flowing out to the east
and then into Mineral Creek, assumed to be fish-bearing.
Along the northeast shoreline of the lake, within the same eastern region, there were several wetland
features and four small streams identified flowing into the lake. Three of these streams were characterized
as non-fish-bearing based on observed size and gradient and one stream marginally meets the physical
parameters to be characterized as fish-bearing. One wetland feature consisted of an open meadow that
acts as a headwater to one of the small streams. The other wetlands in this area are lake-fringe vegetated
shallows, confirming the lakeshore wetland mapped by WDFW PHS in this area. Additional lake-fringe
wetlands were observed to the north and northwestern, as shown on Figure 2. Large woody material (LWM)
was observed piled up and/or floating along the shoreline within this area; and it appears that the
predominant wind direction comes from the west across the lake resulting in accumulation of logs and
other woody debris in this area.
4.3. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCAs) within the assessment area were evaluated under
the definition provided in LCC Chapter 17.38.420. Documented streams, wetlands and Mineral Lake are
all considered FWHCAs under LCC 17.38.420, Table 17.38-6. WDFW maps the site as priority habitat for
“regular concentration” by Rocky Mountain elk. According to LCC 17.38.420, Table 17.38-6, this site may
also need to consider impacts to elk wintering habitat. No elk or evidence of elk concentrations were
observed during site reconnaissance.
We did not complete a comprehensive assessment of potential nesting habitat for marbled murrelet or
NSO. However, broad observations of the terrestrial habitat noted that many areas of the site have been
previously logged with existing forests predominantly characterized by young second growth trees up to
12 inches diameter at breast height (dbh). Nesting platforms are the most important feature of murrelet
nesting habitat and, in order to be suitable for nesting, trees need to have large branches at least 4 inches
in diameter (USFWS 2012). Suitable nesting habitat for NSO includes trees that are a minimum of
20 inches dbh (Harke 2014). In general, forests within the property did not meet criteria to be considered
suitable nesting habitat for either marbled murrelet or NSO. However, this review was not exhaustive and
there may be some areas within the property that meet these criteria; therefore, additional focused
terrestrial surveys may be necessary with future development proposals to identify if project activities could
potentially impact nesting, roosting, foraging or dispersal habitat for these species.
4.4. Design Implications
Wetland and stream boundaries were approximated during the habitat survey and are shown on Figure 2.
Buffers for these features are projected and subject to change based on formal delineation. Tables 2 and 3,
below, provide summaries of these projected buffers.
4.4.1. Wetland Buffers
Wetland buffers are partially determined by the use intensity of the proposed action, as described in
LCC 17.38.260 in Table 17.38-2. In order to estimate buffers for this due diligence level report, use
intensity levels were based on current design features which include camp facilities (dining hall, cabins,
staff housing, etc.), foot paths/hiking trails and open fields adjacent to wetland features. The numerical
wetland buffer value is more accurately determined by the wetland category (based on Washington State
March 8, 2021 | Page 7 File No. 6565-008-00
Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update), considering the impact level
(Table 17.38-3). However, since wetlands were not rated as part of this due diligence level assessment,
wetland habitat function values are approximated and based on general wetland observations. We
estimated buffer values of 75, 110 and 150 based on low, moderate or high level of proposed impact,
respectively (Table 2). These buffer values are consistent across a Category I, II or III wetland with a
moderate level of function for habitat (Table 17.28-3).
TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF APPROXIMATED WETLAND BUFFERS
Critical Area Approximated Buffer
Wetland* Low Impact Moderate Impact High Impact
75 110 150
Notes:
*Wetlands were not rated and therefore these buffers may change depending on habitat score.
4.4.2. Stream Buffers
Streams are considered a designated FWHCA and an “aquatic priority habitat” (LCC 17.38.420). Stream
buffers are based on WDNR stream typing. Stream types were estimated based on available data and field
observations where directly observed and are subject to review and determination by a regulatory authority.
Therefore, the stream buffers shown on Figure 2 are not definitive but rather are based on our best
professional opinion based on the information currently available. Stream buffers extend from the OHWM
of the stream, which were not delineated as part of this assessment. For the purposes of this effort, the
stream buffers were based on the approximate centerline alignment of the stream as estimated during our
reconnaissance. LCC Table 17.38-6 provides the buffers for Type N and Type F waters as 75 and 150 feet,
respectively, and shown in Table 3 below.
TABLE 3. SUMMARY OF APPROXIMATED STREAM BUFFERS
DNR Stream Type Regulated Buffer*
Type F waters 150
Type N waters 75
Notes:
* Stream buffers extend from the OHWM of stream, which were not delineated as part of this survey. Type F are fish bearing streams.
Type N are non-fish bearing streams.
4.4.3. Shoreline Buffers
Lewis County’s Shoreline Master Plan (SMP) program implements and administers permits related to
“Shorelines of the State” within Lewis County. Mineral Lake and associated wetlands and streams
extending landward for 200 feet fall under the jurisdiction of the SMP. The shoreline environment
designation for this site is “Rural Conservancy”. Currently the critical areas ordinance (CAO) has been
updated within the main municipal code (LCC 17.38) but has not been integrated into the SMP. The CAO
in the SMP will be updated as part of Lewis County’s periodic review which is scheduled for June 2021
(Brianna Uy, personal communication). Until that update occurs, critical areas within shoreline jurisdiction
are required to comply with LCC 17.35A. As a consequence, there are two separate critical area codes for
this project which results in two sets of buffers and mitigation regulations. But as a conservative planning
strategy based on guidance from Tim McHarg with Van Ness Feldman and Lanzi Li with Heartland, we have
March 8, 2021 | Page 8 File No. 6565-008-00
provided buffers on critical areas within shoreline jurisdiction to comply with LCC 17.38, as will be the case
once the code is updated.
Proposed development features within shoreline jurisdiction include a dock and waterfront facilities for
storage or potentially showers or restrooms. We have provided a table below that summarizes the potential
shoreline buffers related to these features in Table 4. In addition, for buildings, there is an additional
15-foot setback from the edge of the buffer. Passive, water-oriented recreational uses such as access trails
to water features are allowed within the buffer. The buffers listed in Table 4-1 in the SMP are subject to
change and require coordination with Lewis County planning staff. LCC SMP Chapter 4.04.02C describes
the requirements and process for buffer width averaging which allows applicants to reduce the width of a
portion of the shoreline or critical areas buffer and increase the width of another portion. Water access is
limited at this site due to steep terrain and therefore buffers may potentially be reduced through a shoreline
variance.
TABLE 4. POTENTIAL SHORELINE BUFFERS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FEATURES
Proposed Structures
Shoreline Buffer – Rural Conservancy*
Category Definitions** Distance (feet)
Dock Water-dependent structure/use 0
Waterfront facilities – boat storage, showers and
bathrooms, etc.
Water-related and water enjoyment
structure
75
Recreational Development – such as campsites,
ball fields, arts and crafts facility and campfire pits
Non-water-oriented use 150
Recreational Development – Trails*** Passive water-related and water
oriented recreational use
0
Notes:
*Shoreline buffers for “Rural Conservancy” are based of LCC SMP Chapter 4.04, Table 4-1
**Shoreline use definitions from Lewis County SMP Chapter 03.31.2020
***According to LCC SMP Chapter 4.04, Table 4-1, Note (6), “passive, water-oriented recreational uses are allowed within shoreline
buffers”.
5.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
The project will need to comply with local, state and federal regulations and associated permits. We have
developed a regulatory permitting matrix which identifies potential permit pathways necessary to complete
the proposed project based on environmentally sensitive areas present on the site and the proposed
locations of desired camp features (Table 5). This matrix addresses local regulations, including shorelines
and critical areas, as well as federal and state approvals, including but not necessarily limited to: Clean
Water Act (CWA), ESA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Hydraulic Code Rules (Hydraulic Project
Approval [HPA]).
The sections below provide a summary of permit requirements and process; additional details are provided
in the Table 5 below.
March 8, 2021 | Page 9 File No. 6565-008-00
TABLE 5. ANTICIPATED PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
Permit Agency
Project Elements
Triggering
Regulation
Application
Requirements
Predecessor(s)
for Submittal/
Approval
Estimated
Timeline Other Permitting Considerations
FEDERAL
Clean Water Act
(CWA) (Section
404)
USACE Placing fill within
"waters of the
U.S."
JARPA Form and
Figures
Critical Areas Report
Biological Assessment
for ESA Compliance
(see below)
Cultural Resources
Survey Report
30 Percent
Design 6 to 12
months
This project may require a federal
permit for construction of overwater
structures within Mineral Lake and any
wetlands. A Section 404 permit will be
required if fill or excavation activities
are proposed below the jurisdictional
limits of a "water of the U.S." (OHWM of
Mineral Lake) or fill within wetlands.
Section 7 ESA
Compliance
USFWS and
National
Marine
Fisheries
Service
(NMFS)
Consultation
triggered by
project actions
that require a
federal permit
such as fill within
wetlands, in-water
work in streams
(including culvert
replacement) or
work below the
OHWM of Mineral
Lake.
Biological Assessment
(BA) reviewed during
consultation with
Services prior to
National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA)
approval.
30 Percent
Design
6 to 12
months
ESA review is triggered by a federal
nexus which includes projects that
require a federal permit. ESA review
would include evaluation of
construction impacts to ESA species
and habitat. The effects of habitat
alteration, water quality and
construction activities on listed species
will need to be evaluated. We
anticipate this project will not require
substantial coordination with USFWS
and NMFS as this site does not have
documented use by ESA-listed species.
However, a terrestrial survey may be
required by USFWS for nesting or
dispersal habitat for marbled murrelets
or NSO.
STATE
March 8, 2021 | Page 10 File No. 6565-008-00
Permit Agency
Project Elements
Triggering
Regulation
Application
Requirements
Predecessor(s)
for Submittal/
Approval
Estimated
Timeline Other Permitting Considerations
CWA Section
401 Water
Quality
Certification
Washington
State
Department
of Ecology
(Ecology)
CWA Section 401
Water Quality
Certification
(WQC) are
required for
projects receiving
a Section 404
permit.
If needed, may be
reviewed concurrently
as part of a USACE
Section 404 permit;
otherwise submit Joint
Aquatic Resources
Permit Application
(JARPA) independently
to Ecology. A pre-filing
notification may be
required by Ecology.
30 Percent
Design
6 to 12
months
Section 401 approval may be issued
concurrently as part of a Section 404
permit if the project qualifies. If an
individual permit is required to comply
with Section 404, independent review
of the Section 401 certification by
Ecology would be required.
National
Pollution
Discharge
Elimination
System
(NPDES)
Construction
Stormwater
General permit
(Federal Water
Pollution
Control Act)
Ecology Project action
exceeding
minimum
threshold for
ground
disturbance.
Notice of Intent (online
application)
90 Percent
Design
Stormwater
Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP)
Temporary
Erosion and
Sedimentation
Control (TESC)
Plan
4 to 6
weeks
This permit requires development of
SWPPP and TESC plans and then
provide notice.
HPA WDFW Construction
activity that
changes or affects
the natural flow of
water.
Construction
activity within or
over Waters of the
State.
JARPA, as well as
documentation of a
SEPA decision.
30 Percent
Design
SEPA Approval
45 days Proposed project design involves the
construction of overwater structures
both within the lake (dock) and
streams (pedestrian bridges).
March 8, 2021 | Page 11 File No. 6565-008-00
Permit Agency
Project Elements
Triggering
Regulation
Application
Requirements
Predecessor(s)
for Submittal/
Approval
Estimated
Timeline Other Permitting Considerations
Forest Practices WDNR Construction of
forest roads,
clearing forest
and/or conversion
of forestry lands
to non-timber
land. This permit
is also triggered
when salvaging
standing or down
wood which may
include existing
clear-cut areas
and removal of
the large timbers
floating along the
lake shore.
Forest Practices
Application/Notification
(online application)
30 Percent
Design
60 days The current project proposes
development features over and in
typed water bodies (streams and
Mineral Lake). Road work may require
replacement of culverts which would
also trigger a Forest Practices permit.
There is a substantial amount of large
woody debris along the northeast
shoreline of Mineral Lake and removal
of that material to provide camper
access may also trigger this permit.
LOCAL
SEPA Lewis
County
Required for any
proposal that
involves a
government
“action”, which
includes an
agency decision.
SEPA Environmental
Checklist
30 Percent
Design
3 months Since this project will require Lewis
County review, SEPA is triggered and
will be required. The SEPA
determination is also a requirement of
the HPA permit process. Assume SEPA
determination will be Mitigated
Determination of Non-Significance
(MDNS).
March 8, 2021 | Page 12 File No. 6565-008-00
Permit Agency
Project Elements
Triggering
Regulation
Application
Requirements
Predecessor(s)
for Submittal/
Approval
Estimated
Timeline Other Permitting Considerations
Shoreline
Substantial
Development
Permit (SSDP)
Lewis
County
Development
activities that are
categorized as a
permitted use in
shoreline
environments
present in the
project area and
of which the total
cost or fair market
value exceeds
$5,000*, occur
within 200 feet of
designated
shoreline.
Lewis County Shoreline
Substantial
Development
Application Checklist
which includes JARPA
and Critical Areas
Review (CAR)
30 Percent
Design
3 to 6
months
SMP should be reviewed to ensure the
proposed use is a permitted use. If not,
a Conditional Use Permit or Variance
may also be required.
Shoreline
Conditional Use
Permit
Lewis
County
Uses identified as
“Conditional”
require a
shoreline
conditional use
permit pursuant
SMP Section
7.04.02. Any use
not listed in SMP
Table 5-1:
Permitted
Conditional and
Prohibited Uses
shall require a
shoreline
conditional use
permit.
Shoreline Substantial
Development
Application which
includes JARPA and
CAR
Lewis County Shoreline
Conditional Use Permit
30 Percent
Design
3 to 6
months
“Conditional uses," are shoreline uses
that are not preferred or allowed
outright as set forth in the SMP but
may be permitted when specified
conditions are met.
A Shoreline Conditional Use Permit is
necessary for projects that propose
activities that are not authorized as
“permitted uses” as set forth in the
Lewis County SMP but can
demonstrate consistency with
requirements for conditional uses.
March 8, 2021 | Page 13 File No. 6565-008-00
Permit Agency
Project Elements
Triggering
Regulation
Application
Requirements
Predecessor(s)
for Submittal/
Approval
Estimated
Timeline Other Permitting Considerations
Shoreline
Variance
Lewis
County
Project element
which requests a
modification from
those numerical
standards (i.e.
buffers) for their
proposed
development.
Shoreline Substantial
Development
Application which
includes JARPA and
CAR
Lewis County Variance
Application
30 Percent
Design
3 to 6
months
Variances are issued by local
governments (approved and denied),
then sent to Ecology for further review
and approval and disapproval.
Critical Areas
and Mitigation
Plan
Lewis
County
Construction
within or adjacent
to critical areas as
designated under
local code
(wetlands,
FWHCAs, etc.)
Local Agency
Application Form
CAR
Habitat Mitigation Plan
Geologic Hazard
Assessment
30 Percent
Design
3 to 6
months
GeoEngineers has completed a
reconnaissance level site visit and
identified several critical areas across
the site which include Mineral Lake,
wetlands and streams (fish- and non-
fish-bearing). Formal delineations of
wetland and OHWM boundaries of
streams and Mineral Lake shoreline
will be required. Steep slopes/geologic
hazards are addressed in a separate
report (GeoEngineers 2020) but may
also apply.
Other local
permits
(Clearing,
Grading/Site,
Building, etc)
Lewis
County
Project action
exceeding
minimum
thresholds for
ground
disturbance.
Permits are also
required to
construct
permanent
buildings.
Local application
materials/forms
TESC Plan
Construction Plans.
90 Percent
Design
6 to 8
weeks
--
March 8, 2021 | Page 14 File No. 6565-008-00
5.1. Federal Approval
5.1.1. Clean Water Act
A Section 404 CWA permit from the USACE is anticipated to be required for improvements to road stream
crossings, development of over-water infrastructure such as docks, or other development falling under the
jurisdiction of the CWA, such as filling of wetlands. In conjunction with the Section 404 permit, a
Section 401 permit is also required for work within WOTUS, which includes streams and wetlands identified
within the project corridor. For this project, it is anticipated that the Section 401 permit will be obtained
through the NWP process, with potential review and comment from the Ecology.
The following USACE NWPs may be useful for the proposed improvements with application made through
use of the JARPA form and accompanying drawings:
■ NWP 42 - Recreational Facilities. NWP 42 covers development of playing fields, hiking trails, nature
centers, horse and bike paths. Some small support structures are permittable under this NWP, which
may allow for proposed structures for arts and crafts within WOTUS.
■ NWP 14 – Linear Transportation. NWP 14 applies to projects that require construction, expansion,
modification or improvement of linear transportation projects (e.g. roads, highways, railways, trails) in
WOTUS. The discharge cannot cause the loss of greater than ½-acre of WOTUS.
■ NWP C - Electric Utility Line and Telecommunications Activities. NWP C is also limited to ½-acre of
WOTUS.
5.1.2. Section 7 ESA Compliance
Section 7 ESA consultation with USFWS and NMFS will be required for any project that requires a federal
permit such as fill within wetlands, in-water work for stream crossings or in-water work within Mineral Lake
for dock or other recreational structures. There are no mapped ESA-listed fish species within Mineral Lake
and access to the lake from downstream Nisqually River is prevented by the Alder Dam. The nearest
mapped critical habitat for marbled murrelet and NSO is approximately 4 miles to the west. This site was
not surveyed for suitable habitat and therefore land clearing activities or in-air noise producing construction
activities (i.e. pile driving) may require a terrestrial survey to assess terrestrial habitat for these species.
5.2. State Agencies/Approvals
5.2.1. Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology)
Ecology has jurisdiction over proposed discharges to WOTUS under Section 401 of the CWA. As discussed
above, the 401 permit is anticipated to be obtained through the NWP process, with potential review and
comment from Ecology. Finally, Ecology issues NPDES permits to comply with the Water Pollution Control
Act. Application for an NPDES Construction Stormwater permit requires filing a Notice of Intent with Ecology.
5.2.2. Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
DNR has jurisdiction over forest practices on private and state land. Projects activities that trigger a forest
practices permit for this project are primarily removal of timber and conversion of forestry lands to non-
timber land. If project development includes clearing existing timber, this permit will be triggered. This
permit is also triggered when salvaging standing and down wood which may include existing clear-cut areas
and large floating timbers along the lakeshore.
March 8, 2021 | Page 15 File No. 6565-008-00
5.2.3. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)
WDFW has jurisdiction over proposed activities that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or
bed of “Waters of the State”. A HPA permit will be required for the project actions that occur within
jurisdictional waterbodies, such as Mineral Lake, and surrounding streams. WDFW specifies approved in-
water work windows on a case-by-case basis for each HPA and will identify in-water work construction
windows for project within waters of the state. SEPA compliance is required to finalize review of the HPA.
5.3. Lewis County Approvals
Lewis County has jurisdiction over actions occurring within Lewis County limits, which includes the entire
project corridor. Lewis County will review the project in accordance with the following environmental
regulations:
■ State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). It is anticipated that Lewis County will be the lead agency for
SEPA compliance. SEPA review procedures are outlined in Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.21C
and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11. A SEPA checklist and SEPA determination will be
needed for SEPA compliance, which triggers the need for SEPA notice and appeal periods. The SEPA
checklist will identify existing environmental conditions and likely impacts from the proposed project.
■ Shoreline Master Program (SMP). Portions of the project site are within the jurisdiction of the SMP.
Mineral Lake is considered a “Shoreline of the State”; therefore, development within 200 feet of its
shoreline or associated wetlands is subject to SMP regulations. A Shoreline Substantial Development
Permit will be required. Depending on the final design, proposed structures within the shoreline buffer
may also require a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit. For project elements that require modification of
the numerical standards (i.e. buffers), a Shoreline Variance Application will be necessary.
■ Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO). Lewis County Code (LCC) Chapter 17.38 CAO addresses protection of
environmentally critical areas, including streams, wetlands, steep slopes, landslide hazards, and
associated protective buffers or setbacks. Application will require submittal of application form and
associated project design plans and critical areas studies. We anticipate streams, wetlands and
geologic hazards will need to be addressed for this project. A mitigation plan will also be required to
quantify and compensate for impacts to critical areas.
■ Site Development/Grading/Building Permit. A site development and/or grading permit may be
required for upland grading or material stockpiling activities. Building permits are required for most
new structures.
5.4. Permitting Schedule
Environmental permitting can play a significant role in the project schedule. Estimated agency timelines for
applicable environmental permits are included in Table 5. Many permits cannot be applied for or approved
until specific project design milestones or other permit approvals are obtained. These predecessors are
also identified in Table 5. Local, state and federal permits are typically valid for up to 5 years after permit
receipt, after which time the applicant may be required to update technical documentation and re-submit
application materials if the project has not yet been completed.
March 8, 2021 | Page 16 File No. 6565-008-00
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY
Our reconnaissance level habitat survey identified several wetland and stream features within proposed
area of development. These critical areas were not delineated and a formal delineation will be required
prior to permit submittal. Critical area buffers are approximated and shown on Figure 2. There may also be
additional critical area features located at the site that were not identified during this reconnaissance level
assessment.
Based on our preliminary findings, we believe that the YMCA will be able to construct facilities within the
proposed development areas as currently proposed. Proposed development is permittable with appropriate
coordination with Lewis County and will require mitigation for any impacts to critical areas. A comprehensive
mitigation plan will be required to ensure no net loss of ecological functions.
7.0 REFERENCES
Brianna Uy. Lewis County Community Development Associate Planner, Personal Communication Email.
Dated October 27, 2020.
GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers). 2020. Geotechnical Engineering Services Report, Mineral Lake
Property Due Diligence, Mineral Lake, Washington. Prepared for YMCA Seattle. In progress. GEI File
No. 6565-008-00.
Harke, Vince. 2014. Effects Analysis for Spotted Owl in the Western Washington Lowlands Province. United
States Fish and Wildlife Service, Lacey, Washington. August 2014.
Lewis County Code (LCC). Chapter 17.38 Critical Areas Ordinance.
The Watershed Company (TWC). 2010. Wetland, Stream, and Lakeshore Delineation Sketch.
Unincorporated Lewis County near Mineral, Washington. Prepared for Matt Hough, CPH
Consultants. May 6, 2010.
United States Department of Agriculture – National Resource Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). 2020.
Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2012. Guidance for Identifying Marbled Murrelet Nest
Trees in Washington State.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2020a. Wetlands Mapper.
http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/mapper.html
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2020b. IPaC Resource List of Threatened and Endangered
Species.
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2020a. Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) Database.
Available at: https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/at-risk/phs/maps
March 8, 2021 | Page 17 File No. 6565-008-00
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2020b. SalmonScape Application. Available at:
http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/salmonscape/
Washington State Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 2020. Forest Practices Application Review
System Mapping Application. Available at: https://fpamt.dnr.wa.gov/default.aspx
FIGURES
µ
SITE
Vicinity Map
Figure 1
YMCA Mineral Lake Property - Due Diligence PhaseLewis County, Washington
4,000 4,0000
Feet
Data Source: ESRI Street Map, Wold Topographic Map
Notes:1. The locations of all features shown are approximate.2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication.
Projection: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 10N
P:\6\6565008\GIS\MXD\656500800t0300_F01_VicinityMap.mxd Date Exported: 11/17/20 by maugust
Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate.2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intendedto assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and contentof electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc.and will serve as the official record of this communication.Note: Stream and wetland features shown are considered preliminaryas they were not formally delineated during the survey. Buffers are estimatedand subject to change pending a formal delineation.
Projection: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington South FIPS 4602 Feet
P:\6\6565008\GIS\MXD\06565008t0300_F2_WetlandStreamResults_101320.mxd Date Exported: 11/17/20 by maugust !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
¬«8
¬«5
¬«4¬«2
¬«15 ¬«12
¬«11
¬«10MINERAL
H
ILL
RDMineral Hill RoadMineral Creek RdMineral Lake
Mineral Creek
Data Source: WA DNR
µWetland and Stream Reconnaisance
YMCA Mineral Lake Property - Due Diligence PhaseLewis County, Washington
Figure 2
Legend
!Photo Points
Base Data
Roads (DNR)
Topographic Contours (10-ft)
Aquatic Critical Areas
Mineral Lake
Wetlands
Streams
Type-F (Field Verified)
Type-F (Assumed)
Type-N (Field Verified)
Type-N (Assumed)
Type S (Mineral Creek)
Buffers
Shoreline Management Zone
Shoreline Buffer (Non-Water-Related Uses)
Stream Buffer
Wetland Buffer (High Impact Development)
Wetland Buffer (Moderate Impact Development)
Wetland Buffer (Low Impact Development)
700 0 700
Feet
Western Region
CentralRegion
EasternRegion
¬«2
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Mapped Data Reports
SOURCE DATASET:WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFEPRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES REPORTREPORT DATE:P200316075200PHSPlusPublic03/16/2020 7.52Query ID:Priority AreaCommon NameAccuracySource EntityOccurrence TypeResolutionNotesSource DateSite NamePHS Listing StatusScientific NameSource DatasetState StatusMgmt RecommendationsMore Information (URL)Sensitive DataFederal StatusGeometry TypeSource RecordOccurrencehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/diversty/soc/soc.htmLinesN/ANA7420AS MAPPEDNot WarrantedMineral CreekSASICutthroatPHS ListedWDFW Fish ProgramNOncorhynchus clarkiOccurrenceOccurrencehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/diversty/soc/soc.htmLinesN/ANA7420AS MAPPEDNot WarrantedSASICutthroatPHS ListedWDFW Fish ProgramNOncorhynchus clarkiOccurrenceAquatic habitatPolygonsN/ANAAS MAPPEDN/AN/ANWIWetlandsFreshwater EmergentPHS ListedUS Fish and Wildlife Servicehttp://www.ecy.wa.NAquatic HabitatAquatic habitatPolygonsN/ANAAS MAPPEDN/AN/ANWIWetlandsFreshwater Forested/ShrubPHS ListedUS Fish and Wildlife Servicehttp://www.ecy.wa.NAquatic HabitatAquatic habitatPolygonsN/ANAAS MAPPEDN/AN/ANWIWetlandsFreshwater Forested/ShrubPHS ListedUS Fish and Wildlife Servicehttp://www.ecy.wa.NAquatic HabitatAquatic habitatPolygonsN/ANAAS MAPPEDN/AN/ANWIWetlandsFreshwater Forested/ShrubPHS ListedUS Fish and Wildlife Servicehttp://www.ecy.wa.NAquatic HabitatBiotic detectionPointsN/AGPS147331June 27, 2018TOWNSHIPN/AWS_OccurPointLittle Brown BatPHS LISTEDWA Dept. of Fish and Wildlifehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/pub.php?YMyotis lucifugusBreeding Area03/16/2020 7.521
Priority AreaCommon NameAccuracySource EntityOccurrence TypeResolutionNotesSource DateSite NamePHS Listing StatusScientific NameSource DatasetState StatusMgmt RecommendationsMore Information (URL)Sensitive DataFederal StatusGeometry TypeSource RecordRegular concentrationPolygonsN/AGeneral locality905305AS MAPPEDN/ANISQUALLY DEERPHSREGIONMule and black-tailed deerPHS LISTEDWA Dept. of Fish and Wildlifehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/pub.php?NOdocoileus hemionusRegular ConcentrationNestPointsEndangeredMap 1:100,000 <=103324April 25, 1994TOWNSHIPThreatenedWS_OccurPointNorthern Spotted OwlPHS LISTEDWA Dept. of Fish and Wildlifehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/pub.php?YStrix occidentalisBreeding AreaManagement bufferPolygonsEndangeredNATOWNSHIPThreatenedWS_OwlStatus_BufNorthern Spotted OwlPHS ListedWA Dept. of Fish and Wildlifehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/pub.php?YStrix occidentalisManagement BufferManagement bufferPolygonsEndangeredNATOWNSHIPThreatenedWS_OwlStatus_BufNorthern Spotted OwlPHS ListedWA Dept. of Fish and Wildlifehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/pub.php?YStrix occidentalisManagement BufferManagement bufferPolygonsEndangeredNATOWNSHIPThreatenedWS_OwlStatus_BufNorthern Spotted OwlPHS ListedWA Dept. of Fish and Wildlifehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/pub.php?YStrix occidentalisManagement BufferManagement bufferPolygonsEndangeredNATOWNSHIPThreatenedWS_OwlStatus_BufNorthern Spotted OwlPHS ListedWA Dept. of Fish and Wildlifehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/pub.php?YStrix occidentalisManagement BufferManagement bufferPolygonsEndangeredNATOWNSHIPThreatenedWS_OwlStatus_BufNorthern Spotted OwlPHS ListedWA Dept. of Fish and Wildlifehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/pub.php?YStrix occidentalisManagement BufferOccurrence/migrationhttp://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/diversty/soc/soc.htmLinesN/ANA32342AS MAPPEDN/AMineral CreekSWIFDRainbow TroutPHS LISTEDNOncorhynchus mykissOccurrence/Migration03/16/2020 7.522
Priority AreaCommon NameAccuracySource EntityOccurrence TypeResolutionNotesSource DateSite NamePHS Listing StatusScientific NameSource DatasetState StatusMgmt RecommendationsMore Information (URL)Sensitive DataFederal StatusGeometry TypeSource RecordOccurrence/migrationhttp://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/diversty/soc/soc.htmLinesN/ANA32341AS MAPPEDN/AMineral CreekSWIFDResident Coastal CutthroatPHS LISTEDNOncorhynchus clarkiOccurrence/MigrationOccurrence/migrationhttp://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/diversty/soc/soc.htmLinesN/ANA33861AS MAPPEDN/ASWIFDResident Coastal CutthroatPHS LISTEDNOncorhynchus clarkiOccurrence/MigrationAquatic habitatPolygonsN/ANAAS MAPPEDN/AN/ANWIWetlandsRiverinePHS ListedUS Fish and Wildlife Servicehttp://www.ecy.wa.NAquatic HabitatAquatic habitatPolygonsN/ANAAS MAPPEDN/AN/ANWIWetlandsRiverinePHS ListedUS Fish and Wildlife Servicehttp://www.ecy.wa.NAquatic HabitatRegular concentrationPolygonsN/AGeneral locality905391AS MAPPEDN/ANISQUALLY ELK WINTERINGPHSREGIONRocky Mountain elkPHS LISTEDWA Dept. of Fish and Wildlifehttp://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/pub.php?NCervus elaphus nelsoniRegular ConcentrationDISCLAIMER. This report includes information that the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) maintains in a central computer database. It is not an attempt to provide you with an official agency responseas to the impacts of your project on fish and wildlife. This information only documents the location of fish and wildlife resources to the best of our knowledge. It is not a complete inventory and it is important to note that fishand wildlife resources may occur in areas not currently known to WDFW biologists, or in areas for which comprehensive surveys have not been conducted. Site specific surveys are frequently necesssary to rule out thepresence of priority resources. Locations of fish and wildlife resources are subject to vraition caused by disturbance, changes in season and weather, and other factors. WDFW does not recommend using reports more thansix months old.03/16/2020 7.523
WDFW Test Map
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
PHS Report Clip Area
PT
LN
POLY
AS MAPPED
SECTION
QTR-TWP
TOWNSHIP
March 16, 2020 0 0.6 1.20.3 mi
0 1 20.5 km
1:36,907
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly a ected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of e ects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site-speci c (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-speci c (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
o ce(s) with jurisdiction in the de ned project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Lewis County, Washington
Local o ce
Washington Fish And Wildlife O ce
(360) 753-9440
(360) 753-9405
510 Desmond Drive Se, Suite 102
Lacey, WA 98503-1263
http://www.fws.gov/wafwo/
U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceIPaC
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of in uence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly a ected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a sh population, even if that sh does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water ow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential e ects to species, additional site-speci c and
project-speci c information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local o ce and a species list which ful lls this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an o cial species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local eld o ce directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an o cial species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the sheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information.
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an o ce of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially a ected by activities in this location:
Mammals
1
2
NAME STATUS
Birds
Fishes
Critical habitats
Potential e ects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
Gray Wolf Canis lupus
U.S.A.: All of AL, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, IA, IN, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME,
MI, MO, MS, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VA,
VT, WI, and WV; and portions of AZ, NM, OR, UT, and WA. Mexico.
There is nal critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4488
Endangered
Gray Wolf Canis lupus
Western Distinct Population Segment
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Proposed Endangered
North American Wolverine Gulo gulo luscus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5123
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
Marbled Murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus
There is nal critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside
the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4467
Threatened
Northern Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis caurina
There is nal critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside
the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1123
Threatened
Yellow-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is
outside the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3911
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Bull Trout Salvelinus con uentus
There is nal critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside
the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8212
Threatened
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may nd in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur o the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
1
2
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IF A
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
“Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey e ort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of con dence in the presence score. One can have higher con dence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey e ort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in o shore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Breeds Jan 1 to Sep 30
Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias fannini
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 15
Western Screech-owl Megascops kennicottii kennicottii
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Mar 1 to Jun 30
no data survey e ort breeding season probability of presence
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ()
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey E ort ()
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey e ort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ()
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas o the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non-BCC Vulnerable
(This is not a Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) in this
area, but warrants
attention because of
the Eagle Act or for
potential
susceptibilities ino shore areas from
certain types of
development or
activities.)
Great Blue Heron
BCC - BCR (This is a
Bird of Conservation
Concern (BCC) only in
particular Bird
Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the
continental USA)
Western Screech-
owl
BCC - BCR (This is a
Bird of Conservation
Concern (BCC) only in
particular Bird
Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the
continental USA)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my speci ed location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and ltered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identi ed as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to o shore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my speci ed location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe speci ed. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Paci c Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles) potential susceptibilities in o shore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. o shore energy development or longline shing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, e orts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially a ected by o shore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area o the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also o ers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results les underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my speci ed location”. Please be aware this report provides the “probability of presence” of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey e ort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the “no data” indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey e ort is the key component. If the survey e ort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey e ort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
con rm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be con rmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ “Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds” at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identi ed based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on-the-ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classi cation established through image analysis.
FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND
Palustrine
LAKE
Lacustrine
RIVERINE
Riverine
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth veri cation work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or eld work. There may be
occasional di erences in polygon boundaries or classi cations between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuber cid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may de ne and describe wetlands in a
di erent manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to de ne the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modi cations within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning speci ed agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
a ect such activities.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service | Bureau of Land Management, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, NGA, EPA, USDA, NPS
Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species [USFWS]
A specific geographic area(s) that contains features essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and that may require special
management and protection.
Final Linear Features
Final Polygon Features
Proposed Linear Features
Proposed PolygonFeatures
YMCA Mineral Lake
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team,wetlands_team@fws.gov
Wetlands
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Other
Riverine
March 9, 2020
0 1 20.5 mi
0 1.5 30.75 km
1:57,741
This page was produced by the NWI mapperNational Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site.
P I E R C EC O U N T Y
T H U R S T O NC O U N T Y
EastCreekNis
q
u
a
l
l
y
Riv
e
r
Hi
awat
haCr
eekLittle NisquallyRiver, W FRo
un
d
t
o
pCr
e
e
kLit
t
l
eNi
squall
yRi
verMineralLake
AlderLake
Mineral
Lewis County, WashingtonShoreline Master Program
Area of interest in red
0 0.5 1
Miles 1:48,000 [
SMA Rivers & Streams
SMA Lakes
Gifford Pinchot National Forest
Mount Rainier National Park
Highways
LAMIRD
CityUGA
Shoreline jurisdiction boundaries depicted on this map are approximate. They have notbeen formally delineated or surveyed and are intended for planning purposes only.Additional site-specific evaluation may be needed to confirm/verify information shown onthis map.
Data: Lewis County, USFWS NWI, FEMA, USFS, Ecology,WDNR, WSDOT, NRCS NAIP
Lewis County Coalition
City of Morton City of Winlock
Shoreline Environment DesignationsFigure 6 Date: 08/10/2017
Shoreline Environment DesignationAquaticNaturalRural Conservancy
ShorelineResidentialHigh Intensity
P I E R C EC O U N T Y
CopperCreekRou n d topCreek ReeseCreekNisquallyRiver
BigCreek
CattCreekMineralCreek,NFMineralCreekMineralLake
ParadiseEstates
Lewis County, WashingtonShoreline Master Program
Area of interest in red
0 0.5 1
Miles 1:48,000 [
SMA Rivers & Streams
SMA Lakes
Gifford Pinchot National Forest
Mount Rainier National Park
Highways
LAMIRD
CityUGA
Shoreline jurisdiction boundaries depicted on this map are approximate. They have notbeen formally delineated or surveyed and are intended for planning purposes only.Additional site-specific evaluation may be needed to confirm/verify information shown onthis map.
Data: Lewis County, USFWS NWI, FEMA, USFS, Ecology,WDNR, WSDOT, NRCS NAIP
Lewis County Coalition
City of Morton City of Winlock
Shoreline Environment DesignationsFigure 7 Date: 08/10/2017
Shoreline Environment DesignationAquaticNaturalRural Conservancy
ShorelineResidentialHigh Intensity
Independence
C reekLinco l n Creek
Hanaford
CreekSou
th
Hanaford
Cree
k
Snyder Cre ekPackwood
CreekSponenberghCreekNorthForkLincolnCreek Lewis Cr Wildcat Cr
Eagle Cree k
CreekHanaford Mineral CreekBig
C
attBunker
Creek ByronCreekTeeley
Wildca tCreek ScammonCreek
Big w ater Cr
Scatte r CrC reek
WestF orkDesc hutesNorth
CreekC oalCreekCre e k
Cr
eekDu
n
n
CreekCoal
Creek
Tapp Creek Bertha MayLakeLakes
GraniteForkLakePrairie
Creek C
r
e
e
kDeepCreekVanOrnumCreekMineralCo
al
Creek RoundtopCapp
s
Creek
Skate
MineralDeer
CreekMillDell
Creek CreekGarretCre
e
k CreekL u d wigCreekS u m mit CrWinnie WashingtonCrCreek
C
r
e
ekLittleDillenbaugh CreekCreekEightCreek Trout CrCreekElk Creek C reek
North
Jess eLucasCreekCreek
Creek Creek
S e v en CreekJested
Creek G allupBeav er CreekBerwick CreekTaylorC r e e k
F
o
rkStearnsCre
ek CreekNineCreekLakeWallandina
HopeCreekCreekCr eek M a rtin Cree kL
y
nxKatula Cre e k CinnabarWillame
Allen Creek BearCreek
S il ve r
Beaver
Creek
South ForkSouthCreek CreekSand
Creek Lost C reekFork Ha llLakeC
re
ek
Cre
ekMillTiltonLost
Creek CreekEast ForkJohnson
KionaSmithCr
Leste r C r eek
Highland
S
u
r
r
eyRainey CrCree
kSlideCreekSilver
Cr
CrKlickitat Cr
Big Creek Creek
C
re
ek
Steffe
n
Crim
C reekKing
Creek CrCrCreekRoge
r
Creek LittleM i l lC r e ek
Deep Creek Cree k
F r o stBlueCreekThrash
Creek Ki
lbo
r
n
Curtis
Creek Schoole y Cr
Sil
e
rShelton CrC
r
Mack C reek Creek
Winston
M illCreekSouth DeceptionCedarCreekCreekCedar
L a u gh linCreekSnow CreekCinnabarCreek
Creek
ForkFork
L
a
ndersD
uffy Creek Creek
Thurston CreekNorthCreekWinstonBearCreek
George
Creek
S tillmanCreekCreekLittleSalmonCreekCoonCreek Goat CreekOlequaCreekCreekStillwater
Creek
Salmon
CreekCreekCree
kCreek
Hanlan
Creek CedarCreek C r e e kCasc a d e
Salmon
Devils QuartzElkJim C reekRaineyBlackCreekL a ke Creek
CreekDavis
Berry
Creek
C reek
Salzer
Cre
ek
CreekMarcusonCreek
Upper
Lake
Creek
Butter
Cree
k CarltonCreekSummit
Creek
Creek
Clear
Fork
W estF o r k StillmanC reek
A l d er Creek KellerCreek
Cree
kHalf
w
a
y
South
ForkGarrardCreekCreekNorth
Fork
Fa llR iver
K e a rney Creek
G r een
Skookumchuck
Deschute sMuddy
Fo
r
k
B il l C r
S k o o k u m chuck RiverOtter Cr
Tumbl e CrTilton
Connelly
C
r
e
e
k
Coon
Snow Cr
F
o
r
k
West
Tilton
CrNineteenE astFork Tilton
Woods C r
Crystal
Wal lu p tDry
CreekGarr
et
CrB u r to nW i n ston CrW estForkNisquallyLittleHiawathaLittle Desc
h
utes R
Thorn Creek
Lincoln
C r eek
Oliver Cr
Peters
C
r
C reekCreekEastSilverCreekLacamasCreekCre
e
kFoster
O leq u a C r e ek
Brim
Cree kRockCreekWat
e
r
C
reekMillMccormick
Cree
k
Sto
we
Creek
G a rra rd CreekSouth
Fork
C re e k
LincolnCowlitz
River
Cowlitz River
River
Cispus
River
River RiverCispus
Cispus
CispusTil to n
R iverOhanapecoshRiverCo
wl
itzRiver
Nisqually
River
River
River
River RiverRiverRiverRiver
River RiverRiver
EastForkChehalisRiverCowlitzR iver
Newauku m
NewaukumN o r thF orkRiverNewaukumChehalisRiverChehalisRi
v
e
r
Newaukum
River
So
ut
h
For
k
ChehalisRiverL a keMayfieldLake
Ri
f
fe
Lake
Scanewa
Mineral
Lake
Packwood
Lake
Wallupt
LakeMitchellCreekMiddle F o r k Newaukum River
C o r t wr ight
PeEll
Toledo
Vader
Mossyrock
Morton
Chehalis
Centralia
Winlock
Napavine
Ethel
Doty
Curtis
Boistfort
Randle
Galvin
Glenoma
Packwood
Evaline
Mineral
Salkum
Onalaska
Adna
Dryad
Har risHy
pp
a
RdSumme
r
s RdRoad
Smith Rd
T
eitze
lSheridan St
Unio n Av e A
v
e
R
o
a
d
RoadLincolnLittle
Loop Rd Teitzel
R
d
EJoppish RdIngallsH
a
m Hill RdRoa dRoad
HillSeminary Anderson RdSalze
r Ro a d
Graf
Valley
Reinke RdRoadAvenue
KreskyRoadCoal
Alp
h
aCre
ek Road
Bunker Kray RdCreek
Ro
a
dRoadCreekForth Rd
RiceLucasStearns RoadHighway
RdRoad
G offHillMacomber RoadRoadR
o
gersRoad Ha
m
ilton
R
d
N
o
.LoganOppelt
Road
HamiltonR o a dEastHill
Spooner RdState Route 6Road
RoadMiller RdKaul RdCurtisKirklandBrown Pier RdHaight Rd
Brown
in
gRoadBeam Rd Vis ta R dBrown
Road
Road West
Lech Rd Fork
Berry RdJ
a
c
k
s
o
n
RoadPeEll
RoadStateBeaverMohoric RdCrego Hill RoadRa
d
m
ak
er Rd
Road
RdKi
n
g
Cre ekRoadMc
C
ormic
k Cr
eek Rd RoadWoodard Rd
P
l
e
a
santKoontz
Skinner RdRaubuck Road RoadRe
m
m
en
R
d
Jubb Rd
V
a
ll
eyPascoe AvHig
h
way North Prairie
Johnson RoadRoadLentz RdRoadR
o
a
d
Avery Road East Larmon Road
BoistfortRoadRoadU. S. Highway 12
Kiser RdHale Rd W Interstate 5Hale RdEast Antrim Road
RoadN
e
l
s
o
n
R
o
a
dSears MilitaryRoadOyler RoadFisher RoadAllison RdPark Road
RoadOyler
Hanson Rd
Hawkins Rd SRoadMinkler RoadR oadRoadByham Rd
RoadGray RdFrost
CemeteryRoad TuckerRussellR o a d
RoadWinterroad RdHining RdKnowl
es
Ro
a
d
RdRoe
Camus RoadHoweP
o
ets
c
h
R
d
R
a
k
o
z R
dNikula RdChaufty
Road
Road
CollinsE ad onMcNulty RdComa Rd
Brim Cr ToledoComa Kangas RdJohnson Rd
TelegraphSalmon
Cowlitz Loop SouthCreek506 RoadRoute
RdHendrickson Rd No
StateYewRoadRoad
JacksonRupp Rd
LoneFoster CrPloegman RdClasseRoadTucker RdLaytonMaw RdRdHankin RdHopp Rd NMandyRoadBranch RdRoadJackson
M and y R o a d
McClure Road Drews PrairieGuiberson Rd
Maschke RdSaari Rd SouthMilitaryRoadCa
n
a
dy
R
d
Huckleberry Rd
BlakeCalvin RdCowlitz Ridge RdHighw a yRoadWalterRoadMcAndrew RdHemenway Rd
Bi
l
l
C
r
R
dFerrierRoad Coulson RoadLindbeck RdRoad
RayburnRd W
Wirta Rd
Burnett Rd
King
R
o
a
d
Ro
a
d
K
a
h
out RdRoundtree RoadVal
l
e
yLostMuller RdRoadSal
mi RdWildwood
Road
T
a
usche
r
R
o
a
d RoadForkLogan Hill RoadYates RoadForest N apavine
RoadMill RdNe
w
a
uk
u
m
Valley
Sturdevant Rd
LabreeRd603Highway
O a ks
Twin
Clinton
Rd
B
o
i
st
f
ort RdMoo n
Road
Hubbard Rd
Elk Creek Road
Wells RoadR
o
a
d
Hanaford
Pr
o
f
i
t
tRiver
Hei
ghts RdOtto Rd
JeffriesSunset Dr
DeepCreekCr
e
ek
Roa
d TeagueBig
Hanaford
RoadRoad
HanafordHarrisonMic
hi
g
a
n H
ill R
o
a
d
CooksHil l
LIncol
n
Road
Cre
ek
RoadRoadIndependenceDra
per Rd
HwyRailroad StBrook
D
r
Boistfort Wi
nl
ock Rd
Macronovic Rd
Highway 603Hagstrom RdGallagher RdElma DrLiteral RdSennRdNorthKeasling RoadWe
st
SideLentz Rd NHyak RdHaskins RdEast
South Prairie
Hig
h
wa
y
Clark RoadGishRoad
FluckingerTucker Rd W
Sp r in gs
Alpha
Be
c
k
R
d
RoadGreilRoadJensen RdBurntR idge RoadPerkins RdRoad
Road
Salkum Rd
Gor
e
RdFred Plant
RdJorgensenRoadGore Road
Kennedy RdBri
m
Ro
a
d
E vans
Road
Byrd RdRoad
D
u
e
R
o
a
dGrimesRoad
Road
Merchant Road AugustRoad
Frase RdVan Hoesen RdJ o h n s o n RoadJohn s on R d W
Burnt Ridge
RoadRoad
Madden Rd Townsend RdCalvin Rd Justus RdCanyon RdS. R. 122Aldrich Rd
Wilson RdSchoen RdPlant RdHuntting
Gershick RdWinstonCr
e
ek
RoadRd Bowen Rd
Boyd RoadSalmon CreekRoadButts
Ro
a
d
RdRoad
Isbell RdSwigert
RoadRdRoad
RoadSwofford
PerkinsRoad
Hagen Rd
GreenMountainRoadBlue RdMieners Rd
Ro
a
dCompton RdCrumb Rd
Road
MineralHillRoadMi
ne
ra
l CreekRoadSo uthState Route 7Martin RdFrostCr RdWright Rd
HillRoad
Anders onGlenoma RdRoadFalls RdFallsRoadPeters
Ashfield
Road
Sp e ar s Road
Road
Cispus
Road
Skate Cr Rd N
Carr RoadBennett RdBaker RdRoadCannonRoadU.S. Highway 12U.S. H ighway 12U.S. Highway 1 2
SpencerAtkinson Rd
Road
Magnus RdSkaggs RdO'
n
e
i
l
Rd
Lowery Rd
Kosmos Rd WConlay Rd Bowen Rd
Savio Rd
Lancie Rd BevinLakeRdBartley RdSkate
C
r
Rd SCeda rCreek RoadStowellPigeonPeterman Hill
Rd
StateRoute131Silv erbr ook CannonRd
Murray Rd
Sh or t R oad
Workman Rd MeadeJer
r
e
ll
s
RdRoadFlynn
Greenhorn Rd
NorthRoad
RoadBea
r Cany
o
n
R
d
RoadCinebarRoa
d
East
Creek Road
Lepisto Rd
Barton Rd
Dokter RdBagshaw Rd
Topelt RdDoty Dryad Road
RoadLeudinghaus
Ocean
Alder StGatch RdJones RdMauerman RdMcDonald
Road
Harkum
Halsea RdCole RdWalville RdRock Cr RdRoad
Allebau
g
h
Rd
PeEll
McDonaldHope Creek RdChristin RdHat cher y Rd
Meskill RoadCeres Hill Road
Parker RdBlack RdHillR o a d
Wendling RdLake Cr RdWhite RdBunker
Stearns Hill Rd
Bunke r RoadCreek RoadBlacksmith RdEcho RdBuck RoadManners RoadNelson RdJylha RdHyppa Rd East
Road
K
o
h
s
e
R
d
Wagner RdGoodrich Foron RdIves Rd
Sandy BlvdScammon Cr RdRoad
Bl
a
n
c
h
a
rd
Bowman RdBrockway
Road
S ta te R o u te 6 AirportDonahoe RdBr
o
c
k
w
a
y
R
d
RoadCousins
RoadDevereese RdFrogner RoadBrownAyelsworth RdRoadSpooner RdPenrose Lane
Chilvers Rd
McLaughlin RdHillRd
Pleasant
PenningPleasant
V
alle
y
Cook Rd
Burri Rd
Ro
a
d
Buck
horn
Jones Rd
WildwoodRoadRdHemenway Rd
Hendric ks o n Rd Imboden RdSmith Rd
Rd
Dunivan Rd
Hirons Rd Aumick RdRoad A
w
miller Rd
Winlock Vader RoadAnnonen RdReed RdTaylor StS.R. 507Zenkner Valley RdHallidayRoad
TeitzelRoad
Gleason RdMc Atee RdShafer RdRoad
National AvTillicum DrWallace Rd Cristler RdMatz RdRamsaur Rd
Sanderson RdArmstrong Rd
TaylorJac
kson
Maurin Rd
Bi
s
h
o
pRibelin RdRoadHil
l
bu
r
g
e
r
R
d
TuneShorey
Galaxie
Road
Urquhart RdPeterson RdRoadRamsey Rd
Harmon Rd
Berry RdRommerman Rd
Monroe
Haywire
Rd West Driv eValley Me adows
Hig
h
wa
y 6
0
3
Rush RoadSommerville Rd
Schreiner RdMeierAvery Road West
Jordan Rd
Wilson Rd
ConradiRoad
Schoolhouse
Conrad
Rayburn RdTennessee RoadFries RdMarttala RdMarttala Rd NHawkins
Jones Road
Gunnell RdRoadBay Rd
Nelson
Kakela RdS.R. 505 Bremgarter RdNevil Road
RoadRarey
Morton RdAlexander RdAn
d
e
r
s
on
Rd
Cope RdWinlockVaderRoadLampr echtNikula
RdReinseth Rd
M c Glaughlin Rd
Allman RdRoth Rd
506Mulford RdBarnesDriveRogers Road WalkerRoadBig
Hanaford Road
Jones Roa
d
H
u
r
d
R
d
Bogar Rd
Road
Pollman Road
Rose
broo
k
Allen RdGuerrierRd
Mosley Rd McCann Rd
Olsen
R
dRoberts
Conway RdNicholson RdS
a
r
ea
u
l
t
R
d Tucker Rd SHighwayTha
ye
r
R
d
BooneHenriot RdSchoolhouse LnOyler Way
Plomondon RdToledoVader Road
Eadon RdSouthRay Rd
B
u
c
kle
y R
d
Cooper RdBaxter Rd
Tooley RdRoadHopp Rd STempleton Rd
Fulton Rd
Hurst RdKi
rk
enda
l
l
RdColeman RdE va ns Rd
S pencerAlpha Way
Hogue RdWirsdorfer RdShort RdCentr alia
Stub Rd
Burchett Sha nklin ViewridgeRoad
Jorgensen RoadWalhaupt Rd
Coughlin RdBerg RdLeonardRoadGilbert Rd SGilbert Rd NAlspach RdHar
ms Rd
Schoen
Wilcox RdPinkerton RdSpencer Rd NHinkley RdRoadBonesDowling RdSchmi
t
Rd
Salm
o
n
C
r
Rd EFi
lber
tRd Klickitat Cr Rd
Longbell
Hada
ller
Wallace Rd
Koons RdRoadGodfreyBlankenshipLarson Meyers Rd
Green Mount a in R d
Perkins RdRyan RdOsborne RdKjesbuHafer RdDay RdStudhalter RdDodge Road
Pleasant
ValleyLutkens RdKlasey RdDavison R dRiffe Hill RdMyers RdHighland
Valley RdTemple RdPriest RdInterchangeRdUden Rd E Wills RdBelcher Rd Cedar LnNaugle RdMineralRoadHolt R d
Mineral Road North
Boyd Rd
Sav io Rd E Kehoe RdKindle RdSlagle RdPeters RdRdMorris RdJoerk RdYoung RdCline
Siler Rd
Jud
d
Rd
Dav is Cr ee k Rd
Bonn e ll R d BelcherRdBlakley Rd
Riff
e
R
d
P
o
w
e
rh
o
u
s
e
R
d
Snyder RdHideawa y LnCraig RdW
ol
d
RoadU.
S
.
High
w
a
y
12
Kehoe RdForest N apavine Rd E
Moorcroft RdRiver Rd
Forest Ridge Dr.Fuller RdRoadRoad
John RdSargent Road
Roe RoadCousinsRoadGarrardU.S. Highway 12
HartCarroll RdRd
Route 508
Howe Rd E
Wepsala RdState
50
5
Rd RdSteveson RdHewitt
Smokey
Stat
e
Rout
e
5
0
8
Kauer RdD luhoshRoad Panisco RdJordan RdValley
Damron Rd
Road
Lester Rd
Thomas Rd
Placid
R
d Colem
an Hi
l
l
Rd
Lero
y
R
d Peter Ck Rd
Butler
R
dFairway DrOsborn Rd
State Route 508RoadDieckman RdElbe RdHolcomb RdKrugerLittl
e
Fuller Rd W .Fuller Rd ESalzer RdFickett RdRoadKionaPattee RoadFircrest RdL im me r Rd Salzer Valley RdGrimes RdKoontz RoadBeville RdN 1st StSouthScheuberRoadChristin Rd W
Route
StateHerriford Rd
Bea ch
Katula Rd
St
e
v
en
s
R
d
Alvord Rd
RoadRdWigley
Jarvis
Mossyrock
Schoonover RdHatfield RdDunn RdKobe RdChandler Road
Stoddard RdDoty RdSkate Cr Rd NMossyrock Rd W Young Road
Bartlett Rd
State Route 505
NorthStar
DrFineview Rd
Meier Rd E
Ridgeview Rd
Crego Ridge Rd
Parnell RdMeyer Rd
Whitney BlvdBieber Rd
Stover Rd
RoadScott RdShort Rd
I
n
t
e
rs
t
ate
5
Sm
i
th
R
d
S
(Hob
s
o
n
R
d
)Carroll Way Blue RdRoad
Fuller RdGarrett Loop Delano RdPadrick RdB
la
ir
R
d Lowery LnSawall AvSawall Av W
Reynolds Ave
Roanoke StG
alvin Road
RouteHarkins RdFerntr
e
e D
rHillcrest RdRoad
Tillie Rd
Zandecki Rd Del Ray RdRdMattsonRoadHaywire
Johnson Rd
Fisher RdSkinn e r
Cispus Rd
Cis
p
u
s
Road S.R. 123Sn odgrass R dColeman RdBirley RdRoad
MineralCr Rd So
RaineyCr R d
Bergen Rd
Ajlune Rd
Rd
RoadRush RdThompsonRdGun Club Rd
Glenoma Rd E
Chapman RdTryon RdLaussier Rd
Road
Big Creek Rd
Paradise Dr
Baugh RdNaylor Rd
Lusk Rd
Deggler RdCarlisle AveKennicott Rd
Dorning RdDavis
LakeNix RdRhoades Rd Ropert Rd
Middle
Ce
n
t
r
ali
a
5
6
507
5
6
6
5
508
12
505
5
506
505
12
508 508
12122
7
7
12
12
131
12
12
Gifford Pinchot Natl Forest
Goat Rocks Wilderness
Mount Rainier Natl Park
Mount Baker - Snoqualmie Natl Forest
Tatoosh Wilderness
Mount St Helens Natl Volcanic Monument
Lewis County, Washington
HYDRIC SOILS
Legend
Hydric Soils
City Limits
Federal Forest Lands
State Route
County Road
City Street
Private Road
Forest Road
This map was compiled by Lewis County Geographic Information Services. The base map was developed by the Washington State Department of NaturalResources by scanning and digitizing United States Geological Survey 1:24,000quadrangle maps. The accuracy of the map has not been verified, and it shouldbe used for informational purposes only. Any possible discrepancies should bebrought to the attention of Lewis County Geographic Information Services.
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic Datum: 1983 North American DatumU.S.G.S. State Plane Zone 5626
Independence
C reekLinco ln Creek
Hanaford
CreekSo
uth
Hanaford
Cre
e
k
Snyder Cr ee kPackwood
CreekSponenberghCreekNorthForkLincolnCreek Lewis Cr Wildcat Cr
Eagle Cree k
CreekHanaford Mineral CreekBig
C
attBunker
Creek ByronCreekTeeley
Wildca t Creek ScammonCreek
Big w ater Cr
Scatte r CrC r eek
WestForkDes ch utesNorth
CreekC oalCreekCr e e k
Cr
eekDu
n
n
CreekCoal
Creek
Tapp Creek Bertha MayLakeLakes
GraniteForkLakePrairie
Creek C
r
e
e
kDeepCreekVanOr
numCreekMineralCo
al
Creek RoundtopCapp
s
Creek
Skate
MineralDee
rCr
eekMillDell
Cree
k CreekGarretCre
e
k CreekL u d wigCreekSu m mit CrWinnie WashingtonCrCreek
C
r
eekLittleDillenbaugh CreekCreekEightCreek Trout CrCreekElk Cre ek C reek
North
Jes s eLucasCreekCreek
Creek Creek
S e v e n CreekJested
Creek GallupBeaver CreekBerwick CreekTaylorC r e e k
F
o
rkStearnsCreek CreekNineCreekLakeWallandina
HopeCreekCreekCreek M arti n Cree kL
y
nxKatula Cre e k CinnabarWillame
Allen Creek BearCreek
S ilv e rBeaver
Creek
South ForkSouthCreek CreekSand
Creek Lost C reekFork Ha llLakeCr
e
e
kCr
e
ekMillTiltonLost
Cr eek CreekEast ForkJohnson
Kion
aSmithCr
Leste r C r eek
Highland
S
u
r
r
eyRainey CrCree
kSlideCreekSilver
Cr
CrKlickitat Cr
Big Creek Creek
C
r
e
ek
Steffe
n
Crim
C reekKing
Creek CrCrCreekRoge
r
Creek LittleM ill C ree k
Deep Creek Creek
F r o stBlueCreekThrash
Creek Kil
bo
r
n
Curtis
Creek Schoole y Cr
Sil
e
rShelton CrC
r
Mack C reek Creek
Winston
M illCreekSouth DeceptionCedarCreekCreekCedar
L a u g h linCreekSnow CreekCinnabarCreek
Creek
ForkFork
L
a
ndersD
uffy Creek Creek
Thurston CreekNorthCreekWinstonBearCreek
George
Creek
S ti llmanCreekCreekLittleSalmonCreekCoonCreek Goat CreekOlequaCreekCreekStillwater
Creek
Salmon
CreekCreekCree
kCreek
Hanlan
Creek CedarCreek C r e e kCasc a d e
S al mon
Devils QuartzElkJim C reekRaineyBlackCreekL a ke Creek
CreekDavis
Berry
Creek
C reek
Salzer
Creek
CreekMarcusonCreek
Upper
Lake
Creek
Butter
Cree
k CarltonCreekSummit
Creek
Creek
Clear
Fork
W es t F o rk StillmanC r eek
A l d er Creek KellerCreek
Cree
kHalfwa
y
South
ForkGarrardCreekCreekNorth
Fork
F a l lR iver
K e a rney Creek
G re en
Skookumchuck
DeschutesMuddy
Fo
r
k
B ill C r
S k o o k u m chuc k RiverOtter C r
Tumbl e CrTilton
Connelly
C
r
ee
k
Coon
Snow Cr
F
o
r
k
West
Tilton
CrNineteenE astFork Tilton
Woods C r
Crystal
Wal l u p tDry
CreekGar
r
e
t
CrB u r t o nW i n s to n CrW estForkNisquallyLittleHiawathaLittle Des
c
h
utes
R
Thor n Creek
L incoln
C r eek
Oliver Cr
Peters
C
r
C reekCreekEastSilverCreekLacamasCreekC
re
e
k
F o s t er
O le q u a Cr ee k
Brim
CreekRockCreekWat
e
r
CreekMillMccormick
Creek
Sto
we
Creek
G a rra rd CreekSouth
Fork
C ree k
LincolnCowlitz
River
Cowlitz River
River
Cispus
River
River RiverCispus
Cispus
CispusTil t o n
R iverOhanapecoshRiverCo
wl
i
tzRiver
Nisqually
River
River
River
River RiverRiverRiverRiver
Rive
r RiverRiver
EastForkChehalisRiverCowlitzR i ver
Newauk u m
NewaukumN o r thF orkRiverNewaukumChehalisRiverChehalisRi
v
e
r
Newaukum
River
So
ut
h
For
k
Chehali
sRiverL a keMayfieldLake
Ri
f
f
e
Lake
Scanewa
Mineral
Lake
Packwood
Lake
Wallupt
LakeMitchellCreekMiddle F o r k Newaukum River
C o r t wr ight
PeEll Napavine
Toledo
Vader
Mossyrock
Morton
Chehalis
Centralia
Winlock
Ethel
Doty
Curtis
Boistfort
Randle
Galvin
Glenoma
Packwood
Evaline
Mineral
Salkum
Onalaska
AdnaDryad
Ha rrisHy
pp
a
RdSummer
s RdRoad
Smith Rd
Te
i
tz
e
lSheridan S tUn ion A ve A
v
e
R
o
ad
RoadLincolnLittle
Loop Rd Teitzel Rd EJoppish RdIngallsH
a
m Hill RdRoa dRoad
HillSeminary Anderson RdSalzer Ro a d
Graf
Valley
Reinke RdRoadCentraliaAvenue
KreskyRoadCoal
AlphaCreek Road
Bunker Kray RdCreek
Ro
a
dRoadCreekForth Rd
RiceLucasStearns RoadHighway
RdRoad
Go ffHillMacomber RoadRoadR
o
gersRoad Ha
milton
R
d N
o.LoganOppelt
Road
HamiltonR o a dEastHillSpooner RdState Route 6Road
RoadMiller RdKaul RdCurtisKirklandBrown Pier RdHaight Rd
Bro
wnin
gRoadBeam Rd Vi sta R dBrown
Road
Road West
Lech Rd Middle Fork
Berry RdJ
a
ck
s
o
n
Ro a dPeEll
RoadStateBeaverMohoric RdCrego Hill RoadRa
dmaker Rd
Road
RdKi
ng
Cr eekRoadMc
Cormick C
reek R
d RoadWoodard Rd
Pl
easant
Koontz
Skinner RdRaubuck Road Road
Re
m
me
n R
d
Jubb Rd
V
all
ey Pascoe AvHighwayNorth Prairie
Johnson RoadRoadLentz RdRoadR
o
a
d
Avery Road East Larmon Road
BoistfortRoadRoadU. S. Highway 12
Kiser RdHale Rd W Interstate 5Hale RdEast Antrim Road
R oadN
e
ls
o
n R
o
a
dSears MilitaryRoadOyler RoadFisher RoadAllison RdPark Road
RoadOyler
Hanson Rd
Hawkins Rd SRoadMinkler RoadR oadRoadByham Rd
RoadGray RdFrost
CemeteryRoad TuckerRussellR o a d
RoadWinterroad RdHining RdKnowl
es
R
o
a
d
RdRoe
Camus RoadHoweP
o
etsc
h
R
d
R
a
k
oz
R
dNikula RdChaufty
Road
Road
CollinsEadonMcNulty RdComa Rd
Brim Cr
ToledoComa Kangas RdJohnson Rd
TelegraphSalmon
Cowlitz Loop SouthCreek506 RoadRo ute
RdHendrickson Rd No
StateYewRoadRoad
JacksonRupp Rd
LoneFoster CrPloegman RdClasseRoadTucker RdLaytonMaw RdRdHankin RdHopp Rd NMandyRoadBranch RdRoadJackson
M and y R o a d
McClure Road DrewsPrairieGuiberson Rd
Maschke RdSaari Rd SouthMilitaryRoadCa
nady
R
d
Huckleberry Rd
BlakeCalvin RdCowlitz Ridge RdHighw a yRoadWalterRoadMcAndrew RdHemenway Rd
Bill Cr R
dFerrierRoad Coulson RoadLindbeck RdRoad
Rayburn
Rd W
Wirta Rd
Burnett Rd
King
R
o
a
d
Ro
ad
Kahout RdRoundtree RoadValleyLostMuller RdRhodes Rd
RoadSal
mi RdWi
ldwood
Road
T
a
u
s
c
h
e
rRo
a
d RoadForkLogan Hill RoadYates RoadForest N apavine
RoadMill RdNe
wauku
m
Valley
Sturdevant Rd
LabreeRd603Highway
Oa ks
Twin
Clinton
Rd
B
ois
t
f
ort RdMoo n
Road
Hubbard Rd
Elk Creek Road
Wells RoadR
oad
Hanaford
Pr
o
fittRiver Hei
ght
s RdOtto Rd
JeffriesSunset Dr
DeepCreekCr
ee
k
Road TeagueBig
Hanaford
RoadRoad
HanafordHarrisonMic
h
ig
a
n Hill R
o
a
d
CooksH ill
LIncoln
Ro a d
Cr
eek
RoadRoadIndependenceDraper Rd
HwyRailroad StBrook Dr
Bo istfo rt W inlo ck R d
Macronovic Rd
Highway 603Hagstrom RdGallagher RdElma DrLiteral RdSennRdNorthKeasling RoadWes
t
SideLentz Rd NHyak RdHaskins RdEast
South Prairie
Highw
ay
Clark RoadGishRoad
FluckingerTucker Rd W
Sp ring s
Alpha
Be
ck
R
d
RoadGreilRoadJensen RdBurntR idg eRoadPerkins RdRoad
Road
Talbott RdSalkum Rd
Gor
e
RdFred Plant
RdJorgensenRoadGore Road
Kennedy RdBri
m
R
o
a
d
E v ans
Road
Byrd RdRoa d
Du
e
R
o
a
dGrimesRoad
Road
Merchant Road AugustRoad
Frase RdVan Hoesen RdJ o h n s o n RoadJo hn s on R d W
Burnt Ridge
RoadRoad
Madden Rd Townsend RdCalvin Rd Justus RdCanyon RdS. R. 122Aldrich Rd
Wilson RdSchoen RdPlant RdHuntting
Gershick RdWinstonCr
ee
k
RoadRd Bowen Rd
Boyd Ro adSalmon CreekRoadButts
Ro
ad
RdRoad
Isbell RdSwigert
RoadRdRoad
RoadSwofford
PerkinsRo a d
Hagen Rd
GreenMountainRoadBlue RdMieners Rd
Ro
adCompton RdCrumb Rd
Road
MineralHillRoadMi
ne
ra
l CreekRoadSouthState Route 7Martin RdFrostCr RdWright Rd
HillRoad
An d er so nGlenoma RdRoadFalls RdFallsRoadPeters
Ashfield
Road
Sp e ar s Road
Road
Cispus
Road
Skate Cr Rd N
Carr RoadBennett RdBaker RdRoadCannonRoadU.S. Highway 12
U.S . H ighw ay 12U.S. Highwa y 1 2
SpencerAtkinson Rd
Ro a d
Magnus RdSkaggs RdO'n
eil R
d
Lowery Rd
Kosmos Rd WConlay Rd Bowen RdSavio Rd
Lancie Rd BevinLakeRdBartley RdSkate
C
r Rd S
Ce d a rCreek RoadStowellPigeonPeterman Hill Rd
StateRoute131Si lve rb ro o k CannonRd
Murray Rd
Sh ort Ro adWorkman Rd MeadeJ
e
rr
e
ll
s R
d
RoadFlynn
Greenhorn Rd
NorthRoad
RoadBear Canyon Rd
RoadCinebarRoad East
Creek Road
Lepisto Rd
Barton Rd
Dokter RdBagshaw Rd
Topelt RdDoty Dryad Road
RoadLeudinghaus
Ocean
Alder StGatch RdJones RdMauerman RdMcDonald
Road
Harkum
Halsea RdCol
e RdWa lville RdRock Cr RdRoad
Allebaugh Rd
PeEll
McDonaldHope Creek RdChristin RdHatchery Rd
Meskill RoadCeres Hill Ro a d
Parker RdBlack RdHillR oa d
Wendling RdLake Cr RdWhite RdBunker
Stearns Hill Rd
Bu nker RoadCreek RoadBlacksmith RdEcho RdBuck RoadManners RoadNelson RdJylha RdHyppa Rd East
Road
K
o
hse
R
d
Wagner RdGoodrich Foron RdIves Rd
Sandy BlvdScammon Cr RdRoad
Bl
an
ch
ard
Bowman RdBrockway
Road
S ta te R o u te 6 AirportDonahoe RdBr
o
ck
w
ay
R
d
RoadCousi
n
s
Ro
a
d Devereese RdFrogner RoadBrownAyelsworth RdRoadSpooner RdPenrose Lane
Chilvers Rd
McLaughlin RdHillRd
Pleasant
PenningPleasant
V
alley
Cook Rd
Burri Rd
Ro
ad
Buckhorn
Jones Rd
WildwoodRoadRdHemenway Rd
He n d ric ks on R d Imboden RdSmith Rd
Rd
Dunivan Rd
Hi rons R dAumick RdRoad A
w
miller Rd
Winlock Vader RoadAnnonen RdReed RdTaylor StS.R. 507Zenkner Valley RdHallidayRoad
TeitzelRoad
Gleason RdMc Atee RdShafer RdRoad
National AvTillicum D rWa
llac
e Rd Cristler RdMatz RdRamsaur Rd
Sanderson RdArmstrong Rd
TaylorJacks
on
Maurin Rd
Bish
opRibelin RdRoadHillbur
ge
r R
d
TuneShorey
Galaxie
Road
Urquhart RdPeterson RdRoa
dRamsey Rd
Harmon Rd
Berry RdRommerman Rd
Mon r o e
Haywire
Rd West Dr iveVa lley Me adows
Highw
ay 6
03
Rush RoadSommerville Rd
Schreiner RdMeierAvery Road West
Jordan Rd
Wilson Rd
ConradiRoad
Schoolhouse
Conrad
Rayburn RdTennessee RoadFries RdMarttala RdMarttala Rd NHawkins
Jones Road
Gunnell RdRoadBay Rd
Nelson
Kakela RdS.R. 505 Bremgarter RdNevil Road
Road
Rarey
Morton RdAlexander RdAn
derso
n R
d
Cope RdWinlockVaderRoadLam prechtNikula
RdReinseth Rd
M c Glaughlin Rd
Allman RdRoth Rd
506Mulford RdBarnesDriveRogers Road WalkerRoadBig
Hanaford Road
Jones Road
H
u
rd
R
d
Bogar Rd
Road
Pollman Road
Rosebrook
Allen RdGuerrierRd
Mosley Rd McCann Rd
Ol
s
en R
dRoberts
Conway RdNicholson RdS
a
re
a
ult
R
d Tucker Rd SHighwayT
h
a
yer
R
d
BooneHenriot RdSchoolhouse LnOyler Way
Plomondon RdToledoVader Ro a d
Eadon RdSouthRay RdB
uckle
y R
d
Cooper RdBaxter Rd
Tooley RdRoadHopp Rd STempleton Rd
Fulton Rd
Hurst RdKirkendall RdColeman RdE va ns RdSpencer Alpha Way
Hogue RdWirsdorfer RdShort RdCe n tra lia
Stub Rd
Burchett Sh a nk lin ViewridgeRoad
Jorgensen RoadWalhaupt Rd
Coughlin RdBerg RdLeonardRoadGilbert Rd SGilbert Rd NAlspach RdHarm
s RdSchoen
Wilcox RdPinkerton RdSpencer Rd NHinkley RdRoadBonesDowling RdSchmit
RdSalmon Cr Rd EFilbertRdKlickitat Cr Rd
Longbell
Hadaller
Wallace Rd
Koons RdRoadGodfreyBlankenshipLarson Meyers Rd
Green Mount a in R dPerkins RdRyan RdOsborne RdKjesbuHafer RdDay RdStudhalter RdDodge Road
Pleasant
ValleyLutkens RdKlasey RdDavison R dRiffe Hill Rd
Myers RdHighland
Va lleyRdTemple RdPriest RdInterchangeRdUden Rd E Wills RdBelcher Rd Cedar LnNaugle RdMineralRoadHo lt R d
Mineral Ro a d North
Boyd Rd
Sa vi o R d E Kehoe RdKindle RdSlagle RdPeters RdRdMorris RdJoerk RdYoung RdCline
Siler Rd
Judd Rd
Da v is C re e k R d
Bo n ne ll R d BelcherRdBlakley Rd
Riffe R
d
P
o
w
er
ho
use
R
d
Snyder Rd Hideaway LnCraig RdW
o
ld
RoadU.
S
.
Highw
ay
1
2
Kehoe RdForest Na pavine R d EMoorcroft RdRiver RdForest Ridge Dr.Fuller RdRoadRopert Rd
Road
John RdSargent Road
Roe RoadCousinsRoadGarrardU.S. Highway 12
HartCarroll RdRd
Route 508
Howe Rd EWepsala RdState
50
5
Rd RdSteveson RdHewitt
Smokey
State R
oute 5
08
Kauer RdDluhoshRoad Panisco RdJordan RdValley
Damron Rd
Road
Lester Rd
Thomas Rd
Placid Rd Col
eman Hi
ll
RdLe
ro
y
R
d Peter Ck Rd
Butler RdFairway D
r
Osborn Rd
State Route 508RoadDieckman RdElbe RdHolcomb RdKrugerLittle
Fuller Rd W.Fulle
r Rd ESalzer RdFickett RdRoadKionaPattee RoadFircrest RdLimm er R dSalzer Valley RdGrimes RdKoontz RoadBeville RdN 1st StSouthScheuberRoadChristin Rd W
RouteStateHerriford Rd
Be a ch
Katula Rd
St
e
ve
ns
R
d
Alvord Rd
RoadRdWigley
Jarvis
Mossyrock
Schoonover RdHatfield RdDunn RdKobe RdChandler Road
Stoddard RdDoty RdSkate Cr Rd NMossyrock Rd W Young Road
Bartlett Rd
State Route 505
NorthStar
DrFineview Rd
Meier Rd E
Ridgeview Rd
Crego Ridge Rd
Parnell RdMeyer Rd
Whitney BlvdBieber Rd
Stover Rd
RoadScott RdShort Rd
I
nte
r
s
ta
te
5
Sm
it
h
R
d
S
(Ho
b
s
o
n
R
d
)Carroll Way Blue RdRoad
Fuller RdGarrett Loop Delano RdPadrick RdBlair
R
d Lowery
LnSawall AvSawall Av W
Reynolds Ave
Roanoke StG
alvin Road
RouteHarkins RdFer
ntr
ee DrHillcrest RdRoad
Tillie Rd
Zandecki Rd Del Ray RdRdMattsonRoadHaywire
Johnson Rd
Fisher RdSki n ne r
Cispus Rd
Cispus
Road S.R. 123Snodgrass R dColeman RdBirley RdRoad
Minera lCr Rd S o
Ra ine yCr Rd
Bergen Rd
Ajlu n e R d
Rd
RoadRush RdThompsonRdGun Club Rd
Glenoma Rd E
Chapman RdTryon RdLaussier Rd
Road
Big Creek Rd
Paradise Dr
Baugh RdNaylor Rd
Lu sk R d
Deggler RdCarlisle AveKennicott Rd
Dorning RdDavis
La
keNix RdLewis County, Washington
NWI WETLANDS
O:\maps\michelle\webmaps\nwi_wetlands.mxd
NWI Wetlands
City Limits
State Route
County Road
City Street
Private Road
Forest Road
This map was compiled by Lewis County Geographic Information Services. The base map was developed by the Washington State Department of NaturalResources by scanning and digitizing United States Geological Survey 1:24,000quadrangle maps. The accuracy of the map has not been verified, and it shouldbe used for informational purposes only. Any possible discrepancies should bebrought to the attention of Lewis County Geographic Information Services.
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic Datum: 1983 North American DatumU.S.G.S. State Plane Zone 5626
Independence
C reekLinco ln Creek
Hanaford
CreekSo
uth
Hanaford
Cre
e
k
Snyder Cre e kPackwood
CreekSponenberghCreekNorthForkLincolnCreek Lewis Cr Wildcat Cr
Eagle Cre e k
CreekHanaford Mineral CreekBig
C
attBunker
Creek ByronCreekTeeley
Wildca tCreek ScammonCreek
Big w ater Cr
Scatte r CrC r eek
WestF orkDe s c h utesNorth
CreekC oalCreekCre e k
Cr
eekDu
n
n
CreekCoal
Creek
Tapp Creek Bertha MayLakeLakes
GraniteForkLakePrairie
Creek C
r
e
e
kDeepCreekVan
OrnumCreekMineralCo
al
Creek RoundtopCapp
s
Creek
Skate
MineralDeer
Cr
eekMillDell
Cree
k CreekGarretCre
e
kCreekL u d wigCreekS um mit CrWinnie WashingtonCrCreek
C
r
eekLittleDillenbaugh CreekCreekEightCreek Trout CrCreekElk Cree k C reek
North
Jes s eLucasCreekCreek
Creek Creek
S e v e n CreekJested
Creek G allupBeaver CreekBerwick CreekTaylorC r e e k
F
o
rkStearnsCre
e
k CreekNineCreekLakeWallandina
HopeCreekCreekCr eek M art in Cre e k
L
y
nx
Katula Cr e e k CinnabarWillame
Allen Creek BearCreek
Sil v e r
Beaver
Creek
South ForkSouthCreek CreekSand
Creek Lost C reekFork Ha llLakeC
r
e
ek
Cre
ekMillTiltonLost
Creek CreekEast ForkJohnsonK
iona
SmithCr
Leste r C r eek
Highland
S
u
r
r
eyRainey CrCree
kSlideCreekSilverCr
CrKlickitat Cr
Big Creek Creek
C
r
e
e
kSteffe
n
Crim
C r eekKing
Creek CrCrCreekRoge
r
Creek LittleM i ll C r e ek
Deep Creek Creek
F r o stBlueCreekThrash
Creek Kil
bo
rn
Curtis
Creek Schoole y C r
Sil
erShelton CrC
r
Mack C reek Creek
Winston
M illCreekSouth DeceptionCedarCreekCreekCedar
L au g h linCreekSnow CreekCinnabarCreek
Creek
ForkFork
L
a
ndersD
uffy Creek Creek
Thurston CreekNorthCreekWinstonBearCreek
George
Creek
S t illmanCreekCreekLittleSalmonCreekCoonCreek Goat CreekOlequaCreekCreekStillwater
Creek
Salmon
CreekCreekCree
kCreek
Hanlan
Creek CedarCreek C r e e kCasca d e
S almon
Devils QuartzElkJim C reekRaineyBlackCreekL a k e Creek
Cr
eekDavis
Berry
Creek
Creek
Salzer
Cree
k
CreekMarcusonCreek
Upper
Lake
Creek
Butter
Cree
k CarltonCreekSummit
Creek
Creek
Clear
Fork
W estF o r k StillmanC r eek
A ld e r Creek KellerCreek
Cree
kHalfwa
y
South
ForkGarrardCreekCreekNorth
Fork
Fa llR iver
K e a rney Creek
G r e en
Skookumchuck
DeschutesMuddy
Fo
r
k
B ill C r
S k o o ku mc huck RiverOtter C r
Tumbl e CrTilton
Connelly
C
r
e
ek
Coon
Snow Cr
F
or
k
West
Tilton
CrNineteenE astFork Tilto n
Woods C r
Crystal
Wal l u p tDry
CreekGarr
e
t
CrB u r to nW i n s to n CrW estForkNisquallyLittleHiawathaLittle De
s
ch
utes R
Thorn Creek
Lincoln Cr eek
Oliver Cr
Peters
C
r
C reekCreekEastSilverCreekLacam asCreekCre
e
kFoster
O le q u a C r ee k
Brim
CreekRockCreekWat
er
CreekMillMccormick
Creek
Stowe
Creek
G arrard CreekSouth
Fork
C ree k
LincolnCowlitz
River
Cowlitz River
River
Cispus
River
River RiverCispus
Cispus
CispusTil t o nR iverOhanapecoshRiverCo
wl
i
tzRiver
Nisqually
River
River
River
River RiverRiverRiverRiver
River RiverRiver
EastForkChehalisRiverCowlitzR i v er
Newauku m
NewaukumN o r thF o rkRiverNewaukumChehalisRiverChehalisRiv
e
r
Newaukum
River
So
ut
h
For
k
Chehali
sRi
verL a keMayfieldLake
Rif
f
e
Lake
Scanewa
Mineral
Lake
Packwood
Lake
Wallupt
LakeMitchellCreekMiddle F o r k Newaukum River
C o r twright
PeEll Napavine
Toledo
Vader
Mossyrock
Morton
Chehalis
Centralia
Winlock
Ethel
Doty
Curtis
Boistfort
Randle
Galvin
Glenoma
Packwood
Evaline
Mineral
Salkum
Onalaska
AdnaDryad
H arris
Hy
p
p
a
R
d
Summer
s
RdRoad
Smith Rd
T
e
i
t
z
e
l
Sheridan S tU ni on A v e A
ve
R
oa
d
RoadLincolnLittle
Loop Rd Teitz
e
l
Rd EJoppish RdIngallsH
a
m Hill RdRoa dRoad
HillSeminary Anderson RdSalzer Ro a d
Graf
Valley
Reinke RdRoadCentraliaAvenue
KreskyRoadCoal
Alph
a
Creek Road
Bunker Kray RdCreek
Ro
a
dRoadCreekForth Rd
RiceLucasStearns RoadHighway
RdRoad
Goff HillMacomber RoadRoadRo
gersRoad Ham
ilton
R
d
N
o
.LoganOppelt
Road
HamiltonR o a dEastHillSpooner RdState Route 6Road
RoadMiller RdKaul RdCurtisKirklandBrown Pier RdHaight Rd
Brown
ingRoadBeam Rd Vista RdBrown
Road
Road West
Lech Rd Middle Fork
Berry RdJa
c
k
so
n
R oadPeEll
RoadStateBeave
r Mohoric RdCrego Hill RoadRad
m
aker
Rd
Road
RdKi
n
gCreekRoadMcC
ormick Creek
R
d RoadWoodard Rd
Ple
a
sant
Koontz
Skinner RdRaubuck Road RoadRe
m
me
n
Rd
Jubb Rd
V
all
eyPascoe AvHighw
ay North Prairie
Johnson RoadRoadLentz RdRoadR
o
a
d
Avery Road East Larmon Road
BoistfortRoadRoadU. S. Highway 12
Kiser RdHale Rd W Interstate 5Hale Rd
East Antrim Road
R oadN
el
s
o
n
Ro
a
dSears MilitaryRoadOyler RoadFisher RoadAllison RdPark Road
RoadOyler
Hanson Rd
Hawkins Rd SRoadMinkler RoadR oadRoadByham Rd
RoadGray RdFrost
CemeteryRoad TuckerRussellR o a d
RoadWinterroad RdHining RdKnowl
es
Ro
a
d
RdRoe
Camus RoadHoweP
o
e
t
sc
h
R
d
R
ako
z R
dNikula RdChaufty
Road
Road
CollinsEadonMcNulty RdComa Rd
Brim Cr ToledoComa Kangas RdJohnson Rd
TelegraphSalmon
Cowlitz Loop SouthCreek506 RoadRoute
RdHendrickson Rd No
StateYewRoadRoad
JacksonRupp Rd
LoneFoster CrPloegman RdClasseRoadTucker RdLaytonMaw RdRdHankin RdHopp Rd NMandyRoadBranch RdRoadJackson
M andyR o a d
McClure Road DrewsPrairieGuiberson Rd
Maschke RdSaari Rd SouthMilitaryRoadCan
a
d
y
R
d
Huckleberry Rd
BlakeCalvin
R
dCowlitz Ridge RdHighw a yRoadWalterRoadMcAndrew RdHemenway Rd
Bil
l
C
r
R
dFerrierRoad Coulson RoadLindbeck RdRoad
Rayburn
Rd W
Wirta Rd
Burnett Rd
King
R
oa
d
Roa
d
Kah
out RdRoundtree RoadVa
l
l
e
yLostMuller RdRhodes Rd
RoadSal
mi RdWildwood
Road
T
a
u
s
c
h
e
r
R
o
a
d RoadForkLogan Hill RoadYates RoadForest N apavine
RoadMill RdNew
a
u
k
u
m
Valley
Sturdevant Rd
LabreeRd603Highway
Oak s
Twin
Clinton
Rd
B
o
i
st
f
ort RdMoon
Road
Hubbard Rd
Elk Creek Road
Wells RoadR
o
a
d
Hanaford
Pr
o
f
i
t
tRiver Hei
ghts RdOtto Rd
JeffriesSunset Dr
DeepCreekCre
e
k
Road TeagueBig
Hanaford
RoadRoad
HanafordHarrisonMic
h
i
g
a
n
H
i
l
l
R
o
a
d
CooksHil l
LIncoln
R oad
Cree
k
RoadRoadIndependenceDrape
r
R
d
HwyRailroad StBrook Dr
Boistf ort Winlock Rd
Macronovic Rd
Highway 603Hagstrom RdGallagher RdElma DrLiteral RdSennRdNorthKeasling RoadWe
st
SideLentz Rd NHyak RdHaskins RdEast
South Prairie
High
w
ay
Clark RoadGishRoad
FluckingerTucker Rd W
Springs
Alpha
Be
c
k
R
d
RoadGreilRoadJensen RdBurntR idgeRoadPerkins RdRoad
Road
Talbott RdSalkum Rd
Gor
e
RdFred Plant
RdJorgensenRoadGore Road
Kennedy RdBri
m
Ro
a
d
E vans
Road
Byrd RdRoad
Due
R
oa
dGrimesRoad
Road
Merchant Road AugustRoad
Frase RdVan Hoesen RdJo h n s o n RoadJohnson Rd W
Burnt Ridge
RoadRoad
Madden Rd Townsend RdCalvin Rd Justus RdCanyon RdS. R. 1 22Aldrich Rd
Wilson RdSchoen RdPlant RdHuntting
Gershick RdWinstonCre
e
k
RoadRd Bowen Rd
Boyd RoadSalmon CreekRoadButts
Roa
d
RdRoad
Isbell RdSwigert
RoadRdRoad
RoadSwofford
PerkinsR oad
Hagen Rd
GreenMountainRoadBlue RdMieners
R
d
Roa
dCompton RdCrumb Rd
Road
MineralHillRoadMi
n
e
r
a
l CreekRoadSout hState Route 7Martin RdFrostCr RdWright Rd
HillRoad
Anders onGlenoma RdRoadFalls RdFallsRoadPeters
Ashfield
Road
Spears Road
Road
Cispus
Road
Skate Cr Rd N
Carr RoadBennett RdBaker RdRoadCannonRoadU.S. Highway 12
U .S. Highway 12U.S. Highway 1 2
SpencerAtkinson Rd
R oadMagnus RdSkaggs RdO'n
e
i
l
Rd
Lowery Rd
Kosmos Rd WConlay Rd Bowen Rd
Savio Rd
Lancie Rd BevinLakeRdBartley RdSk
a
te
Cr Rd
S
C edar Creek RoadStowellPigeonPeterman Hill
Rd
St
ateRout
e131Silverbrook CannonRd
Murray Rd
Short Road
Workman Rd MeadeJ
e
r
r
e
l
l
s
R
d
RoadFlynn
Greenhorn Rd
NorthRoad
RoadBea
r
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
RoadCinebarRoad
East
Creek Road
Lepisto Rd
Barton Rd
Dokter RdBagshaw Rd
Topelt RdDoty Dryad Road
RoadLeudinghaus
Ocean
Alder StGatch RdJones RdMauerman RdMcDonald
Road
Harkum
Halsea RdCole RdWalville RdRock Cr Rd
Road
Alle
b
a
u
g
h
Rd
PeEll
McDonaldHope Creek RdChristin RdHatchery Rd
Meskill RoadCeres Hill R oad
Parker RdBlack RdHillR o ad
Wendling RdLake Cr RdWhite RdBunker
Stearns Hill Rd
Bunker RoadCreek RoadBlacksmith RdEcho RdBuck RoadManners
RoadNel
son RdJylha RdHyppa R
d
East
Road
Ko
h
s
e
R
d
Wagner RdGoodrich Foron RdIves Rd
Sandy BlvdScammon Cr RdRoad
Bl
a
n
c
h
a
r
d
Bowman RdBrockway
Road
S ta te R o u te 6 AirportDonahoe RdBr
o
c
kw
a
y
R
d
RoadCous
i
n
s
R
o
a
d Devereese RdFrogner RoadBrownAyelsworth RdRoadSpooner RdPenrose Lane
Chilvers Rd
McLaughlin RdHillRd
Pleasant
PenningPleasant
V
alley
Cook Rd
Burri Rd
Roa
d
Buck
horn
Jones Rd
WildwoodRoadRdHemenway Rd
H endricks on Rd Imboden RdSmith Rd
Rd
Dunivan Rd
H irons Rd Aumick RdRoad A
w
miller Rd
Winlock Vader RoadAnnonen RdReed RdTaylor StS.R. 507Zenkner Valley RdHallidayRoad
TeitzelRoad
Gleason RdMc Atee RdShafer RdRoad
National AvTillicum DrWa
l
l
a
c
e
R
d Cristler RdMatz RdRamsaur Rd
Sanderson RdArmstrong Rd
TaylorJackson
Maurin Rd
Bis
h
o
pRibelin RdRoadHill
b
u
r
g
e
r
RdTuneShorey
Galaxie
Road
Urquhart RdPeterson RdRoadRamsey Rd
Harmon Rd
Berry RdRommerman Rd
Monroe
Haywire
Rd West D riveValley Meadows
High
w
ay
6
0
3
Rush RoadSommerville Rd
Schreiner RdMeierAvery Road West
Jordan Rd
Wilson Rd
Conradi
Road
Schoolhouse
Conrad
Rayburn RdTennessee RoadFries RdMarttala RdMarttala Rd NHawkins
Jones Road
Gunnell RdRoadBay Rd
Nelson
Kakela RdS.R. 505 Bremgarter RdNevil Road
Road
Rarey
Morton RdAlexander RdAn
d
e
r
s
on
Rd
Cope RdWinlockVaderRoadLamprechtNikula
RdReinseth Rd
M c Glaughlin Rd
Allman RdRoth Rd
506Mulford RdBarnesDriveRogers Road WalkerRoadBig
Hanaford Road
Jones Road
H
ur
d
R
d
Bogar Rd
Road
Pollman Road
Rosebr
o
o
k
Allen RdGuerrierRd
Mosley Rd McCann Rd
Ol
s
e
n
RdRoberts
Conway RdNicholson RdS
a
r
e
a
u
l
t
R
d Tucker Rd SHighwayT
h
a
y
er
R
d
BooneHenriot RdSchoolhouse LnOyler Way
Plomondon RdToledoVader R oad
Eadon RdSouthRay Rd
B
uc
kley R
d
Cooper RdBaxter Rd
Tooley RdRoadHopp Rd STempleton Rd
Fulton Rd
Hurst RdKir
kenda
l
l
RdColeman RdEva ns R d
S pencerAlpha Way
Hogue RdWirsdorfer RdShort RdC ent ralia
Stub Rd
Burchett Shanklin ViewridgeRoad
Jorgensen RoadWalhaupt Rd
Coughlin RdBerg RdLeonardRoadGilbert Rd SGilbert Rd NAlspach RdHarm
s RdSchoen
Wilcox RdPinkerton RdSpencer Rd NHinkley RdRoadBonesDowling RdSchmit
RdSalmon Cr
R
d
EFilbe
r
tRd Klickitat Cr Rd
Longbell
Hadall
er
Wallace Rd
Koons RdRoadGodfreyBlankenshipLarson Meyers Rd
Green Mount a in R dPerkins RdRyan RdOsborne RdKjesbuHafer RdDay RdStudhalter RdDodge Road
Plea
s
a
n
t
ValleyLutkens RdKlasey RdDavison Rd
R iffe Hill Rd
Myers RdHighland ValleyRdTemple RdPriest RdInterchangeRdUden Rd E Wills RdBelcher Rd Cedar LnNaugle RdMineralRoadH olt Rd
Mineral Road North
Boyd Rd
Savio Rd E Kehoe RdKindle RdSlagle RdPeters RdRdMorris RdJoerk RdYoung RdCline
Siler Rd
Judd
Rd
D avis Creek R
d
Bonnell Rd BelcherRdBlakley Rd
Riffe Rd
P
o
w
e
r
h
o
u
s
e
R
d
Snyder Rd Hideaway LnCraig RdW
o
l
d
RoadU.S. Hi
g
h
w
a
y
12
Kehoe Rd
Fore st Napavine
R
d EMoorcroft RdRiver Rd
Forest Ridge Dr.Fuller RdRoadRopert Rd
Road
John RdSargent Road
Roe RoadCousinsRoadGarrardU.S. Highway 12
HartCarroll RdRd
Route 508
Howe R d E
Wepsala RdState
5
05
Rd RdSteveson RdHewitt
Smokey
State
R
o
u
t
e 5
0
8
Kauer RdD luhoshRoad Panisco RdJordan RdValley
Damron Rd
Road
Lester Rd
Thomas Rd
Placi
d
Rd Col
eman Hil
l RdLer
o
y
R
d
Peter Ck Rd
Butler RdFairway
DrOsborn Rd
State Route 508RoadDieckman RdElbe RdHolcomb RdKrugerLittle
Fuller Rd W.Fuller Rd ESalzer RdFickett RdRoadKionaPattee RoadFircrest RdLimm er Rd Salzer Valley RdGrimes RdKoontz RoadBeville RdN 1st StSouthScheuberRoadChristin Rd W
R outeStateHerriford Rd
Beach
Katula Rd
St
ev
en
s
R
d
Alvord Rd
RoadRdWigley
Jarvis
Moss
yrock
Schoonover RdHatfield RdDunn RdKobe RdChandler Road
Stoddard RdDoty RdSkate Cr Rd NMossyrock Rd W Young Road
Bartlett Rd
State Route 505
NorthStar
DrFineview Rd
Meier Rd E
Ridgeview Rd
Crego Ridge Rd
Parnell RdMeyer Rd
Whitney BlvdBieber Rd
Stover Rd
RoadScott RdShort Rd
In
t
e
rs
t
a
t
e
5Smit
h
Rd
S
(
H
o
b
s
o
n
Rd
)Carroll Way Blue RdRoad
Fuller RdGarrett Loop Delano RdPadrick RdBlair Rd Lowery
LnSawall AvSawall Av W
Reynolds Ave
Roanoke StGalvin Road
RouteHarkins RdFer
n
tree
D
rHillcrest RdRoad
Tillie Rd
Zandecki Rd Del Ray RdRdMattsonRoadHaywire
Johnson Rd
Fisher RdSkinner
Cispus Rd
Cispus
Road S.R. 123Snodgras s R dColeman RdBirley RdRoad
MineralCr Rd So
R ai ne yCr R d
Bergen Rd
Ajlune Rd
Rd
RoadRush RdThompsonRdGun Club Rd
Glenoma Rd E
Chapman RdTryon RdLaussier Rd
Road
Big Creek Rd
Paradise Dr
Baugh RdNaylor Rd
Lusk Rd
Deggler RdCarlisle AveKennicott Rd
Dorning RdDavis
Lak
eNix RdLewis County, Washington
STREAM TYPES
O:\maps\michelle\webmaps\stream_type.mxd
Stream Class 1
Stream Class 2
Stream Class 3
Stream Class 4
Water Bodies
City Limits
State Route
County Road
City Street
Private Road
Forest Road
This map was compiled by Lewis County Geographic Information Services. The base map was developed by the Washington State Department of NaturalResources by scanning and digitizing United States Geological Survey 1:24,000quadrangle maps. The accuracy of the map has not been verified, and it shouldbe used for informational purposes only. Any possible discrepancies should bebrought to the attention of Lewis County Geographic Information Services.
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic Datum: 1983 North American DatumU.S.G.S. State Plane Zone 5626
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Lewis County Area,
Washington, and
Snoqualmie Pass Area,
Washington (Parts of King
and Pierce Counties)
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
March 27, 2020
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map..................................................................................................................8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................12
Map Unit Descriptions........................................................................................13
Lewis County Area, Washington.....................................................................15
6—Baumgard loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes................................................15
7—Baumgard loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes..............................................15
8—Baumgard loam, 65 to 90 percent slopes..............................................16
49—Cinebar silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes...............................................17
50—Cinebar silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes.............................................18
51—Cinebar silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes...........................................19
92—Greenwater loamy sand.......................................................................20
116—Klaber silt loam..................................................................................21
119—Lacamas silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes...........................................23
123—Ledow sand.......................................................................................24
128—Mashel loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes.................................................25
145—Newaukum gravelly silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes........................26
146—Newaukum gravelly silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes......................28
147—Newaukum gravelly silt loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes......................29
163—Pheeney-Jonas complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes............................30
164—Pheeney-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes................31
165—Pheeney-Rock outcrop complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes................32
180—Riverwash..........................................................................................33
187A—Pilchuck loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes.............................34
194—Scamman silty clay loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes..............................34
196—Schneider very gravelly silt loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes..................36
198—Schneider very gravelly silt loam, 65 to 90 percent slopes................37
200—Schneider-Baumgard complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes...................37
201—Schneider-Baumgard complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes...................39
203—Schneider-Rock outcrop complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes..............40
204—Schooley silt loam..............................................................................41
243—Winston gravelly loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes....................................43
250—Zynbar gravelly silt loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes...............................44
W—Water....................................................................................................45
Snoqualmie Pass Area, Washington (Parts of King and Pierce Counties).....46
187—Pilchuck loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes................................46
215—Riverwash..........................................................................................47
285—Water.................................................................................................47
References............................................................................................................48
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
Custom Soil Resource Report
6
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
517460051751005175600517610051766005177100517760051781005178600517460051751005175600517610051766005177100517760051781005178600562400 562900 563400 563900 564400 564900 565400
562400 562900 563400 563900 564400 564900 565400
46° 45' 35'' N 122° 11' 6'' W46° 45' 35'' N122° 8' 30'' W46° 43' 13'' N
122° 11' 6'' W46° 43' 13'' N
122° 8' 30'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS840 1000 2000 4000 6000Feet0300 600 1200 1800MetersMap Scale: 1:21,400 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Lewis County Area, Washington
Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 16, 2019
Soil Survey Area: Snoqualmie Pass Area, Washington (Parts of
King and Pierce Counties)
Survey Area Data: Version 21, Sep 16, 2019
Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey
area. These survey areas may have been mapped at different
scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at
different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil
properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree
across soil survey area boundaries.
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Sep 5, 2014—Oct 10,
2016
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
6 Baumgard loam, 8 to 30
percent slopes
12.3 0.6%
7 Baumgard loam, 30 to 65
percent slopes
278.3 13.7%
8 Baumgard loam, 65 to 90
percent slopes
29.8 1.5%
49 Cinebar silt loam, 0 to 8 percent
slopes
47.4 2.3%
50 Cinebar silt loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
23.0 1.1%
51 Cinebar silt loam, 15 to 30
percent slopes
138.6 6.8%
92 Greenwater loamy sand 149.3 7.3%
116 Klaber silt loam 7.5 0.4%
119 Lacamas silt loam, 3 to 8
percent slopes
0.2 0.0%
123 Ledow sand 10.6 0.5%
128 Mashel loam, 5 to 30 percent
slopes
17.3 0.9%
145 Newaukum gravelly silt loam, 5
to 15 percent slopes
39.4 1.9%
146 Newaukum gravelly silt loam,
15 to 30 percent slopes
162.0 8.0%
147 Newaukum gravelly silt loam,
30 to 65 percent slopes
14.3 0.7%
163 Pheeney-Jonas complex, 30 to
65 percent slopes
129.2 6.4%
164 Pheeney-Rock outcrop
complex, 30 to 65 percent
slopes
119.9 5.9%
165 Pheeney-Rock outcrop
complex, 65 to 90 percent
slopes
78.2 3.8%
180 Riverwash 39.0 1.9%
187A Pilchuck loamy fine sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes
0.1 0.0%
194 Scamman silty clay loam, 5 to
15 percent slopes
5.3 0.3%
196 Schneider very gravelly silt
loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes
0.9 0.0%
198 Schneider very gravelly silt
loam, 65 to 90 percent slopes
11.1 0.5%
200 Schneider-Baumgard complex,
30 to 65 percent slopes
47.4 2.3%
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
201 Schneider-Baumgard complex,
65 to 90 percent slopes
41.9 2.1%
203 Schneider-Rock outcrop
complex, 65 to 90 percent
slopes
61.9 3.0%
204 Schooley silt loam 0.7 0.0%
243 Winston gravelly loam, 0 to 8
percent slopes
3.1 0.2%
250 Zynbar gravelly silt loam, 8 to
30 percent slopes
401.5 19.8%
W Water 144.1 7.1%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 2,014.3 99.2%
Totals for Area of Interest 2,031.3 100.0%
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
187 Pilchuck loamy fine sand, 0 to 3
percent slopes
0.4 0.0%
215 Riverwash 7.9 0.4%
285 Water 8.8 0.4%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 17.1 0.8%
Totals for Area of Interest 2,031.3 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
Lewis County Area, Washington
6—Baumgard loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hgr
Elevation: 200 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 55 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Baumgard and similar soils: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Baumgard
Setting
Landform: Ridges, hillslopes
Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from igneous rock and volcanic
ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 15 inches: loam
H2 - 15 to 31 inches: clay loam
H3 - 31 to 46 inches: gravelly clay loam
H4 - 46 to 50 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Soils with Moderate Limitations (G003XF603WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
7—Baumgard loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hh3
Custom Soil Resource Report
15
Elevation: 200 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 55 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Baumgard and similar soils: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Baumgard
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes
Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from igneous rock and volcanic
ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 15 inches: loam
H2 - 15 to 31 inches: clay loam
H3 - 31 to 46 inches: gravelly clay loam
H4 - 46 to 50 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 65 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
8—Baumgard loam, 65 to 90 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hhh
Elevation: 200 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 55 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Baumgard and similar soils: 100 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
16
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Baumgard
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes
Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from igneous rock and volcanic
ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 15 inches: loam
H2 - 15 to 31 inches: clay loam
H3 - 31 to 46 inches: gravelly clay loam
H4 - 46 to 50 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 65 to 90 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
49—Cinebar silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hgc
Elevation: 50 to 2,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 75 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 160 to 250 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Cinebar and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cinebar
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes, ridges, structural benches
Parent material: Loess and slope alluvium mixed with volcanic ash
Custom Soil Resource Report
17
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 12 inches: silt loam
H2 - 12 to 60 inches: silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 16.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Soils with Few Limitations (G002XF503WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Klaber
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Lacamas
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
50—Cinebar silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hgf
Elevation: 50 to 2,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 75 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 160 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Cinebar and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Custom Soil Resource Report
18
Description of Cinebar
Setting
Landform: Structural benches, hillslopes, ridges
Parent material: Loess and slope alluvium mixed with volcanic ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 12 inches: silt loam
H2 - 12 to 60 inches: silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 16.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Soils with Moderate Limitations (G003XF603WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Klaber
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Lacamas
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Scamman
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
51—Cinebar silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hgg
Elevation: 50 to 2,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 75 inches
Custom Soil Resource Report
19
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 160 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Cinebar and similar soils: 95 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cinebar
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes, ridges
Parent material: Loess and slope alluvium mixed with volcanic ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 12 inches: silt loam
H2 - 12 to 60 inches: silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 16.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Sloping to Steep Soils (G003XF703WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Scamman
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
92—Greenwater loamy sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hhy
Elevation: 100 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F
Custom Soil Resource Report
20
Frost-free period: 130 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Greenwater and similar soils: 95 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Greenwater
Setting
Landform: Flood plains, terraces
Parent material: Alluvium derived from andesite and pumice
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 7 inches: loamy sand
H2 - 7 to 60 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Forage suitability group: Droughty Soils (G003XF403WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Fluvaquentic humaquepts
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
116—Klaber silt loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2h8j
Elevation: 100 to 1,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 125 to 200 days
Custom Soil Resource Report
21
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Klaber, drained, and similar soils: 75 percent
Minor components: 25 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Klaber, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 8 inches: silt loam
H2 - 8 to 22 inches: silty clay loam
H3 - 22 to 60 inches: silty clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Forage suitability group: Wet Soils (G002XV102WA)
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lacamas
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Klaber, undrained
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Prather
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Scamman
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
22
119—Lacamas silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2h8m
Elevation: 250 to 1,200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 125 to 200 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lacamas, drained, and similar soils: 60 percent
Lacamas, undrained, and similar soils: 30 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lacamas, Drained
Setting
Landform: Terraces
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 7 inches: silt loam
H2 - 7 to 17 inches: silt loam
H3 - 17 to 27 inches: silty clay
H4 - 27 to 60 inches: clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 3 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low (0.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Forage suitability group: Seasonally Wet Soils (G002XV202WA)
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Lacamas, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Terraces
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 7 inches: silt loam
Custom Soil Resource Report
23
H2 - 7 to 17 inches: silt loam
H3 - 17 to 27 inches: silty clay
H4 - 27 to 60 inches: clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 3 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Very poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low (0.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 6 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Forage suitability group: Seasonally Wet Soils (G002XV202WA)
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Klaber
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Prather
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Scamman
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
123—Ledow sand
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2h8s
Elevation: 80 to 1,200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 80 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F
Frost-free period: 125 to 200 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if protected from flooding or not frequently
flooded during the growing season
Map Unit Composition
Ledow and similar soils: 90 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
24
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Ledow
Setting
Landform: Terraces, flood plains
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 8 inches: sand
H2 - 8 to 20 inches: fine sand
H3 - 20 to 24 inches: silt loam
H4 - 24 to 60 inches: fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Seasonally Wet Soils (G003XF203WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Puget
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Riverwash
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
128—Mashel loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2h8y
Elevation: 1,180 to 1,870 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 175 days
Custom Soil Resource Report
25
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Mashel and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 3 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Mashel
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes
Parent material: Glacial till
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 7 inches: loam
H2 - 7 to 26 inches: loam
H3 - 26 to 59 inches: clay loam
H4 - 59 to 60 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 5 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Forage suitability group: Soils with Moderate Limitations (G003XF603WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Scamman
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
145—Newaukum gravelly silt loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2h9l
Elevation: 1,000 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 60 to 75 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 50 degrees F
Custom Soil Resource Report
26
Frost-free period: 140 to 180 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Newaukum and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Newaukum
Setting
Landform: Terraces
Parent material: Colluvium or glaciofluvial deposits of volcanic mixed with volcanic
ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 9 inches: gravelly silt loam
H2 - 9 to 51 inches: gravelly silt loam
H3 - 51 to 60 inches: very cobbly silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 5 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Soils with Moderate Limitations (G003XF603WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Klaber
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Lacamas
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Scamman
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
27
146—Newaukum gravelly silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2h9m
Elevation: 1,000 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 60 to 75 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 50 degrees F
Frost-free period: 140 to 180 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Newaukum and similar soils: 95 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Newaukum
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Parent material: Colluvium or glaciofluvial deposits of volcanic mixed with volcanic
ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 9 inches: gravelly silt loam
H2 - 9 to 51 inches: gravelly silt loam
H3 - 51 to 60 inches: very cobbly silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Sloping to Steep Soils (G003XF703WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Scamman
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Terraces
Custom Soil Resource Report
28
Hydric soil rating: Yes
147—Newaukum gravelly silt loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2h9n
Elevation: 1,000 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 60 to 75 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 50 degrees F
Frost-free period: 140 to 180 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Newaukum and similar soils: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Newaukum
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Parent material: Colluvium or glaciofluvial deposits of volcanic mixed with volcanic
ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 9 inches: gravelly silt loam
H2 - 9 to 51 inches: gravelly silt loam
H3 - 51 to 60 inches: very cobbly silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 65 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
29
163—Pheeney-Jonas complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hb7
Elevation: 1,500 to 2,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 55 to 90 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 45 degrees F
Frost-free period: 140 to 200 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pheeney and similar soils: 60 percent
Jonas and similar soils: 25 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pheeney
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Parent material: Andesite and breccia colluvium mixed with volcanic ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 4 inches: gravelly loam
H2 - 4 to 29 inches: extremely gravelly loam
H3 - 29 to 33 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 65 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Jonas
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from igneous rock and volcanic
ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 5 inches: gravelly silt loam
Custom Soil Resource Report
30
H2 - 5 to 16 inches: very cobbly silt loam
H3 - 16 to 60 inches: cobbly clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 65 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
164—Pheeney-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hb8
Elevation: 1,500 to 2,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 55 to 85 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 45 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 190 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pheeney and similar soils: 65 percent
Rock outcrop: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pheeney
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Parent material: Andesite and breccia colluvium mixed with volcanic ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 4 inches: gravelly loam
H2 - 4 to 29 inches: extremely gravelly loam
H3 - 29 to 33 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 65 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Custom Soil Resource Report
31
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Rock Outcrop
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 65 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 0 inches to lithic bedrock
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8s
Hydric soil rating: No
165—Pheeney-Rock outcrop complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hb9
Elevation: 1,500 to 2,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 55 to 85 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 45 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 190 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pheeney and similar soils: 65 percent
Rock outcrop: 20 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pheeney
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Parent material: Andesite and breccia colluvium mixed with volcanic ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 4 inches: gravelly loam
H2 - 4 to 29 inches: extremely gravelly loam
H3 - 29 to 33 inches: unweathered bedrock
Custom Soil Resource Report
32
Properties and qualities
Slope: 65 to 90 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Rock Outcrop
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Properties and qualities
Slope: 65 to 90 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 0 inches to lithic bedrock
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8s
Hydric soil rating: No
180—Riverwash
Map Unit Composition
Riverwash: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Riverwash
Setting
Landform: Flood plains, terraces
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 60 inches: Error
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to water table: About 0 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Custom Soil Resource Report
33
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: Yes
187A—Pilchuck loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 17s8x
Elevation: 1,150 to 1,640 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 160 to 210 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Pilchuck and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pilchuck
Setting
Landform: Flood plains, terraces
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 9 inches: loamy fine sand
H2 - 9 to 55 inches: loamy fine sand
H3 - 55 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 48 inches
Frequency of flooding: Occasional
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
194—Scamman silty clay loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hcb
Elevation: 150 to 2,000 feet
Custom Soil Resource Report
34
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 200 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Scamman and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Scamman
Setting
Landform: Terraces
Parent material: Residuum from outwash and sedimentary rocks
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 6 inches: silty clay loam
H2 - 6 to 13 inches: silty clay loam
H3 - 13 to 23 inches: silty clay loam
H4 - 23 to 60 inches: silty clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 5 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 11.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Forage suitability group: Seasonally Wet Soils (G002XV202WA)
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lacamas
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Prather
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
35
196—Schneider very gravelly silt loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hcd
Elevation: 50 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 60 to 75 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 200 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Schneider and similar soils: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Schneider
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Parent material: Colluvium from basic igneous rocks and volcanic ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 6 inches: very gravelly silt loam
H2 - 6 to 30 inches: very cobbly silt loam
H3 - 30 to 45 inches: extremely cobbly silt loam
H4 - 45 to 49 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Droughty Soils (G003XF403WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
36
198—Schneider very gravelly silt loam, 65 to 90 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hcg
Elevation: 50 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 60 to 75 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 200 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Schneider and similar soils: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Schneider
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Parent material: Colluvium from basic igneous rocks and volcanic ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 6 inches: very gravelly silt loam
H2 - 6 to 30 inches: very cobbly silt loam
H3 - 30 to 45 inches: extremely cobbly silt loam
H4 - 45 to 49 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 65 to 90 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
200—Schneider-Baumgard complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hcl
Custom Soil Resource Report
37
Elevation: 50 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 55 to 75 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Schneider and similar soils: 60 percent
Baumgard and similar soils: 25 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Schneider
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes
Parent material: Colluvium from basic igneous rocks and volcanic ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 6 inches: very gravelly silt loam
H2 - 6 to 30 inches: very cobbly silt loam
H3 - 30 to 45 inches: extremely cobbly silt loam
H4 - 45 to 49 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 65 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Baumgard
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes
Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from igneous rock and volcanic
ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 15 inches: loam
H2 - 15 to 31 inches: clay loam
H3 - 31 to 46 inches: gravelly clay loam
H4 - 46 to 50 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 65 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Custom Soil Resource Report
38
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
201—Schneider-Baumgard complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hcm
Elevation: 50 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 55 to 75 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 225 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Schneider and similar soils: 65 percent
Baumgard and similar soils: 25 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Schneider
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes
Parent material: Colluvium from basic igneous rocks and volcanic ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 6 inches: very gravelly silt loam
H2 - 6 to 30 inches: very cobbly silt loam
H3 - 30 to 45 inches: extremely cobbly silt loam
H4 - 45 to 49 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 65 to 90 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.9 inches)
Custom Soil Resource Report
39
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Baumgard
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes
Parent material: Colluvium and residuum derived from igneous rock and volcanic
ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 15 inches: loam
H2 - 15 to 31 inches: clay loam
H3 - 31 to 46 inches: gravelly clay loam
H4 - 46 to 50 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 65 to 90 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
203—Schneider-Rock outcrop complex, 65 to 90 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hcp
Elevation: 50 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 60 to 75 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 150 to 200 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Schneider and similar soils: 65 percent
Rock outcrop: 25 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Custom Soil Resource Report
40
Description of Schneider
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Parent material: Colluvium from basic igneous rocks and volcanic ash
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 6 inches: very gravelly silt loam
H2 - 6 to 30 inches: very cobbly silt loam
H3 - 30 to 45 inches: extremely cobbly silt loam
H4 - 45 to 49 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 65 to 90 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Rock Outcrop
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes
Properties and qualities
Slope: 65 to 90 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 0 inches to lithic bedrock
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8s
Hydric soil rating: No
204—Schooley silt loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hcq
Elevation: 800 to 1,200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 125 to 175 days
Custom Soil Resource Report
41
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained and either protected from flooding
or not frequently flooded during the growing season
Map Unit Composition
Schooley, drained, and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Schooley, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains, terraces
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 6 inches: silt loam
H2 - 6 to 21 inches: silt loam
H3 - 21 to 31 inches: sand
H4 - 31 to 40 inches: silt loam
H5 - 40 to 60 inches: muck
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 15.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Forage suitability group: Wet Soils (G003XF103WA)
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Semiahmoo
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Newberg
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
42
243—Winston gravelly loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hf3
Elevation: 150 to 1,900 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 80 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 50 degrees F
Frost-free period: 140 to 200 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Winston and similar soils: 95 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Winston
Setting
Landform: Terraces
Parent material: Loess and volcanic ash over glacial outwash or alluvium
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 4 inches: gravelly loam
H2 - 4 to 35 inches: gravelly loam
H3 - 35 to 60 inches: extremely gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratification
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: High (about 9.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Soils with Few Limitations (G002XV502WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Klaber variant
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Custom Soil Resource Report
43
Hydric soil rating: Yes
250—Zynbar gravelly silt loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2hfc
Elevation: 1,600 to 3,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 70 to 100 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 46 degrees F
Frost-free period: 90 to 160 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Zynbar and similar soils: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Zynbar
Setting
Landform: Mountain slopes, ridges
Parent material: Volcanic ash and colluvium from igneous rocks and glacial till
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 13 inches: gravelly silt loam
H2 - 13 to 45 inches: gravelly silt loam
H3 - 45 to 60 inches: silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to
high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 15.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Soils with Moderate Limitations (G003XF603WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
44
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Setting
Landform: Alluvial cones
Custom Soil Resource Report
45
Snoqualmie Pass Area, Washington (Parts of King and Pierce Counties)
187—Pilchuck loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2gzs
Elevation: 0 to 2,070 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 160 to 210 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Pilchuck and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 2 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pilchuck
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Parent material: Alluvium
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 9 inches: loamy fine sand
H2 - 9 to 55 inches: loamy fine sand
H3 - 55 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 48 inches
Frequency of flooding: Occasional
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Forage suitability group: Droughty Soils (G002XN402WA)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Riverwash
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
46
215—Riverwash
Map Unit Composition
Riverwash: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Riverwash
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Parent material: Alluvium
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 60 inches: Error
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to water table: About 0 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: Yes
285—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Setting
Landform: Alluvial cones
Custom Soil Resource Report
47
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
48
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
49
Source: Esri, Maxar,GeoEye, EarthstarGeographics,CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS,
Extreme care was used during the compilation of this map to ensureits accuracy. However, due to changes in data and the need torely on outside information, the Department of Natural Resourcescannot accept responsibility for errors or omissions, and therefore, there are no warranties that accompany this material.
0 0.25Miles
Date: 11/11/2020 Time: 11:28:46 AM
Map Symbols Additional Information Legal Description
Forest Practices Activity Map - Application #______________
¯
S02 T14.0N R05.0E, S03 T14.0N R05.0ES27 T15.0N R05.0E, S04 T14.0N R05.0ES26 T15.0N R05.0E, S34 T15.0N R05.0ES35 T15.0N R05.0E, S33 T15.0N R05.0ES28 T15.0N R05.0E*Waste Area
~~~Harvest Boundary
Stream
Ç Rock Pit
U Landing
Y Clumped WRTS/GRTS
× Existing Structure
Road Construction
RMZ / WMZ Buffers
APPENDIX B Site Photographs
Figure
B-1
Site Photographs
Photograph 1. Western region of site where recent clear-cut activities have occurred. Mineral Lake shown in the
background. (March 18, 2020)
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence Phase
Lewis County, Washington
XXXXX-XXX-XX Date Exported: 04/09/15 Photograph 2. Western region of site where recent clear-cut activities have occurred. (March 18, 2020)
Figure
B-2
Site Photographs
Photograph 3. Stream and associated wetlands within western region of site. (March 18, 2020) XXXXX-XXX-XX Date Exported: 04/09/15 Photograph 4. Stream and associated wetlands within western region of site. Mineral Lake shown in
background through trees. (March 18, 2020)
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence Phase
Lewis County, Washington
Figure
B-3
Site Photographs
Photograph 5. Example of documented stream that crosses under main road down towards Mineral Lake within
central region of the site. (March 18, 2020) XXXXX-XXX-XX Date Exported: 04/09/15 Photograph 6. Roadside drainage and associated wetland drainage ditch within central region of the site.
(March 18, 2020)
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence Phase
Lewis County, Washington
Figure
B-4
Site Photographs
Photograph 7. Upland habitat from the road within the northern area of the central region (March 18, 2020) XXXXX-XXX-XX Date Exported: 04/09/15 Photograph 8. Young deciduous habitat within the northern area of the central region. (March 18, 2020)
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence Phase
Lewis County, Washington
Figure
B-5
Site Photographs
Photograph 9. Northern boundary of wetland feature dominant with reed canary grass within eastern region of
the site. (March 18, 2020) XXXXX-XXX-XX Date Exported: 04/09/15 Photograph 10. Northern boundary of wetland feature dominant with reed canary grass within eastern region of
the site. (March 18, 2020)
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence Phase
Lewis County, Washington
Figure
B-6
Site Photographs
Photograph 11. Southern wetland boundary of wetland feature within eastern region of the site
(March 18, 2020) XXXXX-XXX-XX Date Exported: 04/09/15 Photograph 12. Southern boundary of wetland feature within eastern region of the site. (March 18, 2020)
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence Phase
Lewis County, Washington
Figure
B-7
Site Photographs
Photograph 13. Northeastern shoreline of Mineral Lake with extensive large woody debris floating and shoreline
wetland feature looking south. (March 18, 2020) XXXXX-XXX-XX Date Exported: 04/09/15 Photograph 14. Northeastern shoreline of Mineral Lake with extensive large woody debris floating and shoreline
wetland feature looking west. (March 18, 2020)
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence Phase
Lewis County, Washington
Figure
B-8
Site Photographs
Photograph 15. Lake fringe wetland within western region of the site. (March 18, 2020) XXXXX-XXX-XX Date Exported: 04/09/15 Photograph 16. Central portion of the site with steep slope down to Mineral Lake shoreline. (March 18, 2020)
YMCA Mineral Lake Property – Due Diligence Phase
Lewis County, Washington
APPENDIX C YMCA Mineral Lake Vicinity Map
Remaining Individual Lots(371 Acres)
Forest Reserve(1,104 Acres)
Forest Reserve(143 Acres)
Individual Lots(500 Acres)
PROPERTY
Major Roads
Forest Service Roads
B
A
C
D10
20
30
35
Mineral
R
d
S
Mineral Rd N Mineral Hill RdNISQUALLY RIV
E
R
MINERAL CREEKMineral Hill RdMINERAL LAKEELEVATION 1,770’Mineral Mineral Cre
e
k
R
d
706
1
2
3
4 5 6
7 8
9
10 11
A
B
C
D
12
13
14
15 16
17 18
19
2021
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Tract B
VICINITY MAP
LEGEND
N01000’2000’
1
YMCA MINERAL LAKE / PRESUBMISSION PACKAGE / MARCH 13, 2020
APPENDIX D YMCA Mineral Lake Conceptual Development Areas
SITE PLAN: CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS
CRITICAL AREAS LEGEND
200’ MINERAL LAKE BUFFER
STREAM BUFFERS
WETLANDS
HYDRIC SOILS
FEMA 100 & 500 YEAR FLOODPLAIN
CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREA
POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS LEGEND
EXISTING ROADS
POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONE
POTENTIAL LAKE ACCESS
POTENTIAL SATELLITE RECREATION AREA
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL LINE
EXISTING PROPERTY ENTRANCE
NOTES
Orange regions suggest potential developable zones,
however, the area of potential developable zones exceeds
the likely built program on the site. For scale reference:
*The highest intensity development will be concentrated in
the potential development zones with slopes less than or
equal to 15%.
= SIZE OF A 360’*150’ SOCCER FIELD
= SIZE OF A 9000 SQUARE FOOT DINING HALL
= SIZE OF A 2000 SQUARE FOOT PROGRAM SHELTER
= SIZE OF (4) 600 SQUARE FOOT CABINSMinera
l
H
i
l
l
RdMineral CreekMineral Lake
PRIMARY PROJECT ENTRY
N0500’1000’
2
YMCA MINERAL LAKE / PRESUBMISSION PACKAGE / MARCH 13, 2020